Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I suspect the reasoning is thus:

Pi & friends are all well and good when all you're doing is filling out a few initial bitfield states in a pipeline, but when you're designing a highly complicated process by which to deterministically produce a safe but "random" curve, the process of designing that process itself is going to have some unjustified choices in it. The meta-algorithm, if you like, could have been designed to produce a specific result given the input pi.

Publishing & rigidly defining the method before choosing the seed would seem to alleviate all possibility of foul play.



>Publishing & rigidly defining the method before choosing the seed would seem to alleviate all possibility of foul play.

Except, how do you know the seed was not secretly chosen first? There are probably ways around that again, but this rabbit hole is deep.


I can't imagine many things harder than secretly rigging >30 worldwide lotteries.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: