Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I addressed this in another reply, but I'll repeat: it's a temporary solution. You're merely delaying the inevitable, since the block size limit can't be changed without a hard fork.


I don't think anyone is arguing otherwise. But 2x or 8x'ing the capacity would be welcome, especially a while ago when the mempool was dozens of MB.

It's silly to say it's not a permanent solution therefore not worth doing at all.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: