Imaging being called in. Ok guys we don't know what the problem is but it's costing the company $3500 per minute the bug stays unfixed just in interests. No pressure.
I was on a conference call with a bank that due to a number miscommunications and general idiocy was under the impression that they were possibly in violation of some banking laws (no comment on what laws) because they misinterpreted what exactly was happening. Their lawyers supposedly told them they were at risk for an unbelievable sum of fines and criminal stuff.
In short they saw some data they didn't understand that seemed to indicate things at the bank were very much not how they were thought to be, and indicated something very specific was happening. In reality that was not the case but a lot of assumptions by morons somehow were believed and everything snowballed into lots of corroborating "evidence" that seemed to indicate bad things. This was a bank that rarely had this level of stupid information and assumptions rise to the top so nobody actually questioned it no matter how absurd it seemed.
My presence on the call was purely because the bank wanted every vendor they had looking to see if they saw problems, so I was basically just poking around telling them what i saw from my end.
At one point on the call there was a dude in an unmanned data center literally just flipping off power switches and cutting the cables of various equipment as he was given the locations for it. It was frantic and very unamerican bank like (at least the ones I worked with were pretty cool customers normally). I turned my speakerphone on to let my coworkers listen to the chaos.
In the end, it was a stupid SQL server related virus thing that created some good old fashioned network disruption and when that was solved and nothing looked like the sky was falling, everyone came to their senses. Once the dude pulled the power to enough of them everything calmed down and I checked my bank account and it was all there... but no excess either :(
Because you can't purposefully botch a sale in order to later recover it. Also because you can't avoid botching sales by being more conservative or adding more process. In short, sales and engineering have basically nothing in common.
I don't think GP was talking about a scenario where the same engineer who created the bug fixed it and gets rewarded, rather one where a different engineer fixes it. Of course it wouldn't make sense as you describe it.
How do you decide objectively who is responsible for every single bug? The whole thing is ripe for abuse from all sides. You need a blameless culture to have good engineering, not a bounty-based one.
