I have no issue with the study. Seems plausible. I do have an issue with, for example, the idea that a diversity program at a company constitutes a mode of social exclusion rather than an attempt to redress historical exclusion. But I seem to find myself standing in a room full of people that take it as self-evident that men are oppressed.

> But I seem to find myself standing in a room full of people that take it as self-evident that men are oppressed.

Nobody is saying that men are particularly oppressed, just that men irrespective of race has much stronger reactions to it. An example is that women have never in history made a violent rebellion against their male oppressors, but male slaves has done so countless times in every society which kept slaves.