I don't read wikipedia if the page is locked, because locked pages are a clear indicator of editorialization from wikipedia. It's basically their icon for wikipedia's opinion section.
Why won't you read one or more of the 30 links that Wikipedia cites in the above article? Since you don't read locked articles, would you like me to link them here? I'd be happy to.
The trouble with trump is that there literally was too much going on. So it’s easy to divert or redirect whenever he’s caught doing something that would have brought down any other president on its own.
You conveniently leave out the fact that trump made not one but two separate calls (that we know of) to pressure Georgia officials regarding the certification of the election results.
One call to SOS raffensberger was made on January 2 and a hour long recording of it is not in dispute. This is the call where trump conveniently asks the official in charge of certifying the election in that state to “find” the exact number of votes required to flip the state from blue to red. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Raffensperger_phone_ca.... Note that page is not “locked” so perhaps it will meet your criteria to consider reading it and the linked primary sources?
Trump also made another call to Frances Watson, an official in raffensbergers office, earlier in December. This is the call you are referring to, where the post quoted text that turned out not to be accurate once the recording was released. The original quote said that Trump asked her to “find the fraud” and if she did she would become a “national hero”. Once the recording was released it was revealed he actually - a sitting US president - told her that “the country is counting on” her finding fraudulent votes in Fulton county.
Trump used the confusion immediately to crow about how the reporting on the “Georgia call” is a hoax, knowing full well that most people will merge the two calls in their mind, casting doubt not only on the December call, but also on the much more damning January call as well.
Short- I don’t care who you trust, but a recording of any sitting us president personally pressuring a state official to “find” just enough votes to flip the result to benefit him is a red line for democracy.
Here's the first "incident" referred to in the above link:
> O'Keefe and colleagues were arrested in the Hale Boggs Federal Complex in New Orleans in January 2010 and charged with entering federal property under false pretenses with the intent of committing a felony, at the office of United States Senator Mary Landrieu, a Democrat. His three fellow activists, who were dressed as telephone repairmen when apprehended, included Robert Flanagan, the son of William Flanagan, acting U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of Louisiana.[195][196] The four men were charged with malicious intent to damage the phone system.[197] O'Keefe stated that he had entered Landrieu's office to investigate complaints that she was ignoring phone calls from constituents during the debate over President Barack Obama's health care bill.[198]
Which of these sentences, specifically, are false, biased, or misleading?
Did O'Keefe not actually break into a federal building?
Did he not state that he entered her office?
Was he not actually arrested and charged with a felony?
One more, in the Trump Georgia call, did Donald Trump say "I just want to find 11,780 votes"?
