Anyone can make anything which supposedly “works better as cash”.
How will they create confidence in the money, though?
In addition, please bear in mind aluminium and copper are more _generally useful_ than gold.
We cannot state, therefore, a money’s usefulness is more important than the hardness of the money: i.e. its scarcity and resistance to fundamental change.
This is likely why most competing currencies these days claim to be “decentralized”. It’s really just their way of claiming hardness without openly admitting to such.
How will they create confidence in the money, though?
In addition, please bear in mind aluminium and copper are more _generally useful_ than gold.
We cannot state, therefore, a money’s usefulness is more important than the hardness of the money: i.e. its scarcity and resistance to fundamental change.
This is likely why most competing currencies these days claim to be “decentralized”. It’s really just their way of claiming hardness without openly admitting to such.