Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Did you even read it? It clearly says they're ineffective. Your doctor was correct to dismiss it as nonsense.


Ironically, OP saw a random thing that seemed like a claim and blindly believed it.


If the parent poster successfully treated their myopia, they have a n=1 to the contrary and it is the only n that matters for them.


They didn't say they did, they said that they once saw a book that their doctor dismissed as quackery. Reading the title of this study that also dismisses it as quackery has convinced them that it wasn't quackery.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: