It’s just a term that signals “completion in between” rather than “after”. Regular code completion usually doesn’t take the following blocks into account mostly because these are grammatically vague due to an ongoing edit.
Your comments may be sympathised to, but why on earth are they addressed to the root commenter. They simply shared their findings about an acronym.
Because they mentioned it, why on earth would you think that is not a valid response in a thread that mentions it, from my observation that's pretty much how forum like threads work.
More pressingly why do you think you should police it?
Your comments may be sympathised to, but why on earth are they addressed to the root commenter. They simply shared their findings about an acronym.