Consider someone starts a slavery business that grab easily pickable children to raise them as perfect specialized workers then put the to the free sell/rent market.
End users could choose for other "moral" alternative if they wish. One even could point out that already happen in some parts of the world and that helps happy customers to solve their needs.
However most people prefer to contraint others wallet usage to enforce certain ethic rules. Where to place the line of ethics/constraint is very cultural dependent - to its wide definition.
One way to handle that is to look profitability for citizen instead of customers, then what's profitable for Uber users should be balanced with what's profitable for Uber drivers. That is usually what people want from a gouvernements and laws (and I guess we both agree that is not the same as what is profitable for business).
Given how much it’s been discussed over human history… it seems very likely that does not exist. And is yet another dispute that has to be decided via the political process in the first place.
Consider someone starts a slavery business that grab easily pickable children to raise them as perfect specialized workers then put the to the free sell/rent market.
End users could choose for other "moral" alternative if they wish. One even could point out that already happen in some parts of the world and that helps happy customers to solve their needs.
However most people prefer to contraint others wallet usage to enforce certain ethic rules. Where to place the line of ethics/constraint is very cultural dependent - to its wide definition.
One way to handle that is to look profitability for citizen instead of customers, then what's profitable for Uber users should be balanced with what's profitable for Uber drivers. That is usually what people want from a gouvernements and laws (and I guess we both agree that is not the same as what is profitable for business).