I meant "not necessarily to program in". E.g. it's not going to be something you... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Periodic on April 16, 2009 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Haskell: It’s like Klingon, but with math I meant "not necessarily to program in". E.g. it's not going to be something you use all the time. The sad fact is that a lot of existing code and companies use fairly safe languages like C and Java, but simply knowing how to think about functional programming will help you out with all your programming, no matter the language.

banned_man on April 17, 2009 [–]

I'm curious why you consider C to be safe but Haskell not. Seeing as C has no bounds checking on arrays, runtime type-checking, or garbage collection, I'm tempted to argue to the contrary.

science4sail on April 17, 2009 | [–]

I'm guessing that Periodic means "safe" in terms of popularity and visibility, not ease of programming.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact