Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 0x0x0x's commentslogin

Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the idea. I setup canaries on both my wife and my own accounts after your article made the rounds.

So far no hits..


And interestingly enough to what some are complaining about the screen saver, on OS X the screen saver, desktop picture, and sound theme are bastard children with near zero updates in a decade. Straight up. But they're still customizable for people who want to.

What's wrong with that? Just provide a standard install location and let those that want to utilize it do so.

As an avid Mac OS X/Linux/Ubuntu user, I really truly don't get the direction Canonical is heading with Unity.

edit: spelling


Photostream... taking pics on the iPhone and watching them appear nearly instant in iPhoto is amazing tech.


Let's get Bay to direct it. sees guns, chases, explosions


The community speaks - you have the choice to listen.


The community speaks that it is obsessed with Steve Jobs? How is that many posts of something we know about going to help me learn more about business, entrepreneurship, or programming?


The community's job isn't serving your narrow interests. The community addresses its own needs.

For the moment, it needs this.


They were roughly simultaneous, and most have only a couple of comments each hours later. I don't think anybody is finding much value in actually reading all three dozen restatements of the same story. It was just a collective-action problem that HN doesn't have good tools for solving.


I think it's a side effect of many people submitting the story rather than explicitly upvoting it (in which case upvotes would cluster around one or two stories, as they do for the top ones). Since submissions count as upvotes, and there's a critical mass of people submitting each version of the story, they all end up on the front page. You'll notice there are a couple where the comments are alive, but in a situation like this (single story, many sources, many people submitting each without checking if it's already there), this is exactly what would happen.

It's also possible some people are hoping for a karma boost by submitting a story many others are likely to submit, and thus there is an incentive to submit a story on the gamble that noone else has done it yet, since many others are likely to submit it too.


That may be.

But the truth is that if you had even a passing interest in technology from the 1970's or later, and you still have a pulse right now, there is not a single thing more worth discussing at this moment than the life and passing of this great man.


Why? Is there more insight to be added? Lets not confuse grieving with insightful technical conversation.


Yes.

Plus, anyone who wants something else can simply click "More" at the bottom of the page.


I think it's a form of grieving. Not much point in wasting mental energy opposing it.


Is your life so narrowly focused on HN that you can't take a day long break from learning about "business, entrepreneurship, or programming" and visit some other sites?


From the authors, founders, luminaries, etc., of these posts, have you learned nothing more about business, entrepreneurship, or programming? The community may not be obsessed with Steve Jobs. Instead, obsessed with the innovation he has driven into this world. All of which, in turn, leads business, entrepreneurship, and programming.


Steve Jobs's career literally defined the tech entrepreneur dream that this site is all about.

He can own it completely for a few hours. It's fine with me.


There is a lot of small, interesting news coming out as people tell stories. As someone who admires, uses and develops for the products produced by Apple, and has done for a long time, I'm personally curious to discover as much as I can. For me, it's been a great learning opportunity and also has prompted me to reflect on my own business (and life) practices. Major events are great impetuses.


It is sad to know he won't see that project through to completion.


> But it's already been in the market for, what, 16 months? If they don't have another refresh until next year, that's a pretty long time to have one chassis.

You should see the PowerMac/Mac Pros...


Sounds like an interesting model for my workflow. Keep HN posted.


There's so much crap at that link, what exactly is the hilarity?


This probably

http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/10294229930/paul-carr-t...

But it's not funny, more like shitty behavior.


Rosetta saw plenty of use just from Adobe apps. It took them about a year and half IIRC to release an x86 version of Photoshop.


edit: and didn't Office:Mac take forever too?


yeah, office 2008 was the first native x86 version, IIR (and I swear it takes longer to start up then the PPC version of 2004 did under Rosetta, which is just ridiculous).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: