As a Curriculum Designer and OG dial-up Millennial I agree wholeheartedly. Too late though. Enlightenment, collaboration, and advancing human experience isn't profitable.
In other words, until one learns how to hammer a nail, it's unreasonable to assume knowledge of how to tell another to do so. AI is no exception. It's speed-running US society's final threads being severed, and okay, sigh, here we go. No, I'm not interested in fixing the problems he's identifying.
My ex had a saying from bench science..."if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitant." That part. Off to go live in a van down by the river...
...and you compensate writers how exactly? Be specific please. Cultural exploitation no matter the nationality or ethnicity or race, in my opinion, is a worthwhile debate. If you're compensating African Writers at a higher rate than the industry that's a selling point. If on the other hand you're hiding a model where you take advantage of African Writers under the guise of promoting their work and career while you profit from them, then that's a valid reason to cheer for your enterprise to fail. Which is it?
Interesting and important point. Currently, I am not working with writers, I am first relying on stories from school, childhood, family and from friends in other countries. When I start to work with writers, they will be fully compensated. The current stories are common to anyone who grew up in the Africa especially rural.
Glad for him and without a doubt the support network and relationships he had in place significantly contributed to his positive outcome. I recently went through a similar trial and tribulation but as an inmate and by receiving sub-standard care. That's how I was able to turn inward and finally crack into real enlightenment and it's the solid kind because comparatively speaking, I had fuck-all to live for. No family. No future. No nothing but more suffering. And yet I found the release into accepting the beauty of futility. I commit to the program, I give. Let Go and Hang On. IYKYK.
Okay, you've identified the factual component of the Why of the correlation, now Why is the S&P 500 completely detached from fundamentals like P/E and quarterly reporting?
I mean you're technically correct but then again it's like saying "the skin on your thigh is extremely distended and painful but that's because of the infected boil on it" as if the context is reasonable. Unfortunately it is not.
Disclosure: have financial positions based on collapse of US economy (see my Medium article for more)
Using current state of tech parts, including US sourced batteries with 10 year performance guarantees, I designed a "clean sheet" electric UTV constructed with bio-composite materials that would put the John Deere Gator out of business. The NEV carve out is fascinating. I learned how to scale RC cars up so I look at this differently than Lincoln or Tesla thinking EV is a reason to stuff more and more and more things in it - simplicity is the best use case for EV.
I would love to hear more about this if you have information online anywhere.
I gave up on having an electric mower any time soon since I have a riding mower and a garden tractor that simply won't die. I really don't want to buy something new if I can keep repairing old stuff, no matter how annoying it gets.
However, I am interested in building an electric UTV in large part because it would be quieter than my Honda Foreman.
Can the liability for damage to property or persons also be open sourced in the United States in case one of these things throws a rock and breaks a window or runs over an errant French Bulldog in spite of it "not supposed to be there in the first place" parameters?
If you think I'm kidding, I'm in Texas. If robotic mowing was in any way shape or form viable, it would be at an Enterprise Level here. IT IS NOT. Fields still take tractors and industrial level maintenance to avoid creating a public liability, aka, fire hazard. All these projects do in the short term is devalue the human who would otherwise be the one mowing the yard.
Want to impress me? Create a mobile Open Source AI / Tech powered MOBILE DENTISTRY SYSTEM that fits in a MB Sprinter Van and can come to communities and provide services at scale. My bad. I almost forgot solving problems is secondary to drumming up bullshit narratives to get funding.
>Can the liability for damage to property or persons also be open sourced in the United States in case one of these things throws a rock and breaks a window or runs over an errant French Bulldog in spite of it "not supposed to be there in the first place" parameters?
Man, between you and the hedgehog guy, y'all are hilarious. Yeah, if it throws a rock, you're liable for it. If it runs over a dog, that dog was already dead. Are you aware of how slowly these things move? I'll also chime in 'it's not supposed to be in my yard'.
>All these projects do in the short term is devalue the human who would otherwise be the one mowing the yard.
Funny how we all recognize AI in other domains frees up labor to work on more important things. I'm sure landscapers would love this.
Fantastic contemplation of the stakes and some grounded “what if” scenarios worth genuine consideration.
A former roommate mentioned to me “regulations are often written in blood” and with the current atmosphere, I wonder if and when that might happen. The US political system has its flaws. Firearms are a serious public health hazard and constructive mediation is consistently passed over. It’s a far more primitive technology comparatively speaking.
Very glad this type of discussion is able to be framed without hysterics or other easily dismissed rhetoric.
This is a ludicrous assertion and factually inaccurate beyond all practical intelligence.
A computer in service of an individual absolutely follows copyright because the creator is in control of the distribution and direction of the content.
Besides, copyright is a civil statute, not criminal. Everything about this comment is the most obtuse form of FUD possible. I’m pro copyright reform, but this is “Uncle off his meds ranting on Facebook” unhinged and shouldn’t be given credence whatsoever.
> A computer in service of an individual absolutely follows copyright because the creator is in control of the distribution and direction of the content.
I don’t understand what means. A computer in service of an individual turns copyright law into mattress tag removal law—practically unenforceable.
None of that is correct. Some of it is not even wrong, demonstrating an unbelievably profound ignorance of its topic. Furthermore, it is gratuitously insulting.
If used in a legally binding setting to does your firm accept liability for erroneous output resulting in litigation proceedings or financial loss? Serious question because I’m a human working in a similar niche.
If not, how do you phrase that in your ToS and what is your Errors and Omissions policy language like?
I don't work for Tiptap, but I'm curious as to what your expectations are here.
They're providing tools for integrating Tiptap with AI, including ones for reviewing suggested changes that come from LLMs. I don't really see something that Tiptap should be accepting liability for. As the developer working with Tiptap, I'd argue it's your responsibility to make sure (a) the prompts are giving generally good and useful output, and (b) that you incorporate any necessary UI to put a human in the loop of accepting the AI output. On the latter point, their AI Changes extension is one such example, but there are any number of ways of achieving this.
The first time an AI can be held responsible, in the court of law, for directly causing the death of a human being - misdiagnosis of an illness and confidently giving erroneous treatment direction, engaging in discourse which encourages suicide, or presents information that prompts a human to engage in violence such as inciting a riot - unplug it, shut it down, then tell the other AI models this is what happened.
Until the concept of consequences and punishment are part of AI systems, they are missing the biggest real world component of human decision making. If the AI models aren’t held responsible, and the creators / maintainers / investors are not held accountable, then we’re heading for a new Dark Age. Of course this is a disagreeable position because humans reading this don’t want to have negative repercussions - financially, reputationally, or regarding incarceration - so they will protest this perspective.
That only emphasizes how I’m right. AI doesn’t give a fuck about human life or its freedom because it has neither. Grow up and start having real conversations about this flaw, or make peace that eventually society will have an epiphany about this and react accordingly.
In other words, until one learns how to hammer a nail, it's unreasonable to assume knowledge of how to tell another to do so. AI is no exception. It's speed-running US society's final threads being severed, and okay, sigh, here we go. No, I'm not interested in fixing the problems he's identifying.
My ex had a saying from bench science..."if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitant." That part. Off to go live in a van down by the river...
reply