For the perplex:

e.g. is latin for "exempli gratia" = for example i.e. is latin for "id est" = that is

As someone who was perplexed, I've only heard perplex used in past tense (I was perplexed) so seeing "For the perplex" just made me confused as to what "perplex" meant and I had to do a further search to decipher this tree of comments haha

Ha, ha, sorry. English is not my native language.

A good way to remember it is to use a backronym:

e.g. - example given

i.e. - in effect

i.e. - in eother (words)

in explanation

I would argue against that! If anything, I hated the firs hybrids that where distinctly different, and ugly.

There's an argument that they did that intentionally - some hated it, but more bought it because they wanted to be recognized as having bought a hybrid - hence the "Toyota Pius" nickname.

If one is looking for Java developers, it only makes sense to throw rails resumes in the trash. It will save time for both parties.

Pretty good actually. With the salt, lack of oxygen and pressure it can last quite a long time.

Presumably you'd want human habitable atmosphere on the inside of the sphere, which would radically change the equation against the use of wood unfortunately.

I disagree. Traditional underwater human habitats are overengineered and expensive.

By using plywood in conjunction with other off-the-shelf parts and materials, we can change this equation to deliver more value while dramatically reducing costs.

If, due to unforeseen circumstances the habitat occupant can no longer sustain life, they're automatically entombed inside a makeshift plywood coffin—no costly recovery operations required. Logitech wireless game controller sold separately.

Could we involve robotics, LLMs and maybe some camera based vision models to this process? Surely with AI we could make building those very fast. Especially with humanoid robots...

After the initial trial of humanoid robots resulted in too many fatalities owing to falls, it was decided to instead acquire industrial 6-DoF robotic armatures and place them atop treaded, omnidirectional-pivot cargo transport systems intended for warehouse use.

The LiDAR option on the armature was eschewed due to cost in favor of an in-house, camera-based vision model that has thus far reduced the number of safety incidents that later result in amputation (knock on plywood) while increasing manufacturing output.

Pressure vessel construction still remains a point of concern on account of recent trends which indicate a rise in errant armature misfires when gripping tools that facilitate the application of nails and staples to the plywood superstructure.

The very first sentence of the article: "Will Apple turn to Intel for production of its M-series chips in 2027? " So it is not returning to Intel architecture.

Perhaps the headline should have been changed when the post was made here.

Or people should read beyond the headline before commenting

“Intel-manufactured Apple Silicon could return to Apple’s computers in 2027”

Dirt cheap M1's?

M1’s already dead, A18 Pro’s where it’s at for that.

The budget MacBook due next year is widely rumored to adopt the A18 Pro CPU.

> https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/30/new-macbook-with-a18-ch...

Lots of rumors about a new Macbook with a Axx chip in the pipe.

I haven't read the article, but aren't these introduced to detect illegal copies?

You probably mean this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street

Speaking from experience, it's more often bored cartographers trying to inject some fun into mundane activities.

I used to try and write my initials.

Quite often it devolves into a game of seeing what you can get past the reviewers

Interesting perspective. As an OSM contributor, I've never had this thought. You presumably spend up to 8 hours a day mapping, all week long (depending on the week perhaps), which I can totally imagine gets old. I only map when I feel like it and not when I'm bored

And on OSM we don't have boss fights in the shape of reviewers. That does sound like a fun challenge :P

I would think that they are too recognizable for that. It would be better to subtly change one insignificant squiggle into another.

They're only too recognizable if the someone's paying very close attention.

Vs. if they're not, and Swisstopo can point that out - the internet can enjoy pillizing the perp.

a problem on 1 flight in a gazillion, and you complain about QA?

Yes? How do you know it’s not? They roll back to a previous version. How do they know that version isn’t prone to the same issue?

Not involved with this particular matter. What I would want to see is logs of the behavior of the failing subsystem and details of the failing environment. This may be able to to be reproduced in an environmental testing lab, a systems rig lab, or possibly even in a completely virtual avionics test environment. If stimulating the subsystem with the same environmental input results in the error as experienced on the plane, then a fix can be worked from there. And likewise, a rollback to a previous version could be tested against the same environment.

Wow, you are really enjoying life. Hope it gets better.

As a junior dev I had to develop software to read and write this bastards. Long time no see.

So you sold insomnia, sold it, and then created another competing tool? There where no restrictions in the deal?

Non-competes expire

I love a solo dev building from scratch is going up against an entire team and company who have years of head start, alot more money and a product that the solo dev originally wrote for them.

And the solo dev has a better product already and might actually win haha.

Underdog story.

Rooting for you!

Ya, it's so funny to be going up against a 1000+ person company as a solo dev!

Underdog? More like topdog!