curiosity... did the guy who freaked out learn about what was happening on the site?
I mean: did he freak out in the forum of the site or in real life? (without knowing what was happening on the site)
Let's see if we can make it generate the script for West Side Story by fuzzing the prompts until the edit distance is minimal. Reverse prompt engineering for beginners.
all to judge the person and not to reason on his words; if I point to the mountain, why are you talking about me? Im pointing to damned mountain, talk about the mountain, damn!
Only one false-positive? That's quite an achievement worth posting here. Snark aside, it's almost impossible to release (non-malicious, obviously) indie software these days that doesn't at least trip two or three AV products on VirusTotal that noone has ever heard of.
the problem of a free market in the management of the important hubs of a sector (as is Google for most of the services of its type on the internet) is that they (the big names in the sector, those who reach the top with the free market), are which then once they arrive they can do as they prefer.
the problem of a non-free market, in this matter, would be a government monopoly, with the same problem: they can do as they like.
the alternative to this currently is not easily applicable, and does not give the current advantages of the "big" (whether they are companies or governments the result does not change; really, it is the same).
if you think that Russia and its coming private Internet, or the American NSA security system, or even that I know ... Amazon and eBay, or Facebook and its network (not just the Social Network site, but all its additional services, and where it gets to manage what it manages), or even Chinese censorships on the Internet, are different from each other (to give random examples), think again.
then of course comes troll-boss Trump (they ban him from Twitter and other similar sites) and everyone thinks (confused) that this is not real wath I am writing in this comment.
we are beyond the conspiracy, here the conspiracy comes to life by itself, randomly, without anyone creating it; now in its own life.
who is at the top decides for who is below the top, obviously the developers of Droidscript appeal, they do not like this decision, but they are like everyone else they are subject and subject to the "big".
if you don't want big problems from the "bigs", don't support them, don't use them.
I see nobody answered this… so I'll answer with the caveat that I'm the author and thus biased. But I did use RT before making Filmulator, and I still use it in conjunction occasionally.
RawTherapee does no photo management. Filmulator does.
RawTherapee has many ways to achieve a given result, with tons of flexibility, but gives little guidance as to what's best for what. Filmulator only has one tool for each job, and is much less flexible overall—but it's easier to learn.
RawTherapee can edit jpegs and tiffs. Filmulator only edits raws.
The UI philosophy for Filmulator is to never add things before making them fully usable and easy to learn. I like to point to the cropping tool as a significant pain point in RawTherapee that I was able to implement more elegantly in Filmulator.
> RawTherapee… gives little guidance as to what's best for what
Not sure about that. RawPedia is chock full of information relevant to pre-production (calibration, etc.), photography and post-production techniques, along with advice on development tool usage. I’ve learned a lot from it, which will stay with me even if I move away from software itself. It’s one of those tools with educational documentation that doesn’t just explain what the tool does but actually teaches a lot about the problem domain (similar to docs for DCamProf, which has the same maintainer).
> RawTherapee can edit jpegs and tiffs. Filmulator only edits raws.
Most software can consume DNG but almost nothing, except for camera firmware, can produce it. RT’s ability to edit 16-bit TIFFs output means it can participate in diverse workflows with other raw processors.
(For example, I use Siril to combine multiple exposures, and then can still apply a RawTherapee profile with all the numerous curves, Lab, film emulation, CIECAM and other power tools that get my pixel data into output-referred image state. Of course, some controls behave differently with a 16-bit TIFF than when a DNG image, but it’s not that difficult to adjust to that.)
Filmulator, on the other hand, can’t be used other than at the very beginning of the workflow, which takes away from its flexibility.
That said, RT sort of stands alone so far, and more open-source software that can compete with it can only be appreciated as far as I, a happy user, am concerned.
this microblogging platform is clearly crap, it has a vomiting bird as its logo, and follows the trend of those who then arrive at the shit-storm, which is not only illegal, but a clear manifestation of inhumanity; I personally despise any use of the Internet as if it were a defecator or similar, and I hope this platform will fail, for the little good that exists
