OAuth is frequently marketed as "more secure". But implementations often confuse authentication with authorization, resulting in problems like this.

I just say auth. You decide which one I mean.

I know it's a joke, but it's funny because it's (somewhat) true. To add to the confusion, sometimes one of them gets abbreviated "authn". That is so unhelpful.

Me too. All the server software (postgres, caddy, bun, etc) I'm using runs just fine on Debian, and I never have had updates break something on my Debian servers.

Clicked because of Elasticsearch, then wondered why I hadn't known of radar.com before. Just the autocomplete at a reasonable price that I need.

For as many times as they mention it, it would seem that it is not really TBD.

> Sorry, I missed this in the winning design. Where does it say that?

I didn't notice any prisons included in the design, so that assumption seems fair.

> didn't notice any prisons included in the design, so that assumption seems fair

Does it?

You don’t need dedicated prison space as you won’t have a permanent prison population. (Depending on labour requirements and resource availability this may not be a choice.) Nothing about not having a prison implies no hierarchy. And you don’t need prisons to “condemn people to death.”

I'm hoping and praying for the Ladybird browser to succeed, as I despise the Mozilla organization (Firefox itself is ok, imo).

Even for AI summaries that leech off your content without sending any traffic your direction?

I dunno, they are still doing doing bug fixes to Winforms.

Not sure I agree on the adoption problem. A few medium sized client projects are nothing compared to the massive internal .NET codebases Microsoft has that run some of their largest services.

.NET team members have acknowledged this on podcast interviews, .NET Rocks, Nick Chapsas, The Unhadled Exception, among possibly others.

There is so much more than just slapping servers in racks when you reach the hundreds of thousands or millions in server hardware. Good control plane software makes a night and day difference.

Admittedly this would have been an exotic for the Bay Area but mundane for elsewhere use-case since we just needed really fast disk and fast compute because we just ran model tuning and backtesting on the machines. 90% utilization, 100G network, 4xNVMe. We only had an 8-member team so much of the management/IT-layer replacement stuff that Oxide enables wouldn't have been as high leverage across the tens of thousands of cores. We almost certainly left a lot of stuff on the table, though.

Also, is your username something interesting? It feels familiar but a quick `echo -n '' | md5sum` didn't yield anything.

It's a random sequence.

I suppose I must just have seen you post here before and that's why it's familiar. Funny, felt so familiar.