Here in New Zealand, you're required to be enrolled to vote, even if you never intend to actually vote. Enrolling requires an address. I imagine it's similar in Australia, where actually voting is required by law.
I believe in New Zealand other government agencies aren't allowed to access your data without your consent though.
In my experience, blocking entire channels rather than individual videos is much more reliable. Clearing out related videos from your watch history also helps a lot.
I use the web browser add-on, "Channel Blocker", to block channels. It puts an X next to the channel name. Clicking it permanently removes that channel's videos from every YouTube page.
I use, "BlockTube", to block keywords in video titles and channel names so those videos never show up in searches.
I use, "Unhook", to remove recommended videos from YouTube pages.
The Steering Council said their intention is to remove the GIL-build in future:
> Long-term, we want no-GIL to be the default, and to remove any vestiges of the GIL (without unnecessarily breaking backward compatibility). We don’t want to wait too long with this, because having two common build modes may be a heavy burden on the community (as, for example, it can double test resources and debugging scenarios), but we can’t rush it either. We think it may take as much as five years to get to this stage.
There's a lot of information that was only ever posted to Twitter (whether you're a fan of that or not). Even if only 0.1% of it was valuable, that's still an incredible wealth of information lost. Think about how many pages across the internet cite tweets, how many links would be dead if everything was purged.
This demonstrates a real issue: even information you "own" and feel like you can pull the plug on, really becomes part of a global discussion that can only be lessened by removing it.
A tweet you posted 10 years ago might be irrelevant noise to you, but someone else may have quoted it, assuming it's archived on a "too big to fail" platform, effectively eternal, and then from there it spreads into other conversations.
Who's responsible for deciding how and when to archive that?
Aside from that, there's huge historic value in the mundane in the aggregate. We have fine-grained knowledge of the rise and fall of cultural trends and figured-- the sort of stuff that will never make a "formal" historical record but will richly flesh out future understanding of early 21st century life. Much as many of today's historians will get more value out of a Tudor era garbage dump than a perfect statue of Henry VIII, social media will be an unimaginable treasure trove for 2500's historians.
The Mojang accounts weren't great for security. No 2FA or anything (just security questions), and if you lost your account / it was stolen, you were pretty stuffed. The only way to recover it was to present the transaction ID of your purchase of the game to support, which most people don't have and you were never told to keep. I saw lots of people get permanently locked out of their accounts.
I guess it also doesn't make sense for them to maintain a parallel login system when the Microsoft one gets (presumably) millions of dollars of investment every year. Though Microsoft accounts are more complicated to use, with configuration being split across Microsoft, Xbox, and Mojang/Minecraft itself. And it seems they like locking people out for opaque reasons.
>The Mojang accounts weren't great for security. No 2FA or anything (just security questions), and if you lost your account / it was stolen, you were pretty stuffed. The only way to recover it was to present the transaction ID of your purchase of the game to support, which most people don't have and you were never told to keep. I saw lots of people get permanently locked out of their accounts.
It was in fact super easy to just search my email Inbox for emails from Mojand and find the proof or purchase.
With MS I have 3 fucking accounts and not by choice, they bought Skype and Mojand and forced me into their super shitty system, I spent 30 minutes 1 year ago to migrate the Minecrtaft accoutn and more then 30 minutes a few weeks back to login back into Minecraft because I needed to detective my way to figureout what Microsoft account they connected to my Mojang purchase.
I hope in a few years someone leaks what greedy motives were behind this forced migrations, probably to sell more shit.
The mojang accounts were superior in every way in terms of security. Hahha, microsoft is a huge attack surface. And with microsoft, you also need to secure your account against microsoft itself, which isn't easy, they will randomly extort previously unknown personal information like phone numbers to access your account. If you only have 1 number, and its linked to a different account, you just lost your account.
I don't understand why people think a microsoft account could ever possibly be more secure.
