Not everyone is handling PII. Where I work, anything like that is only available to a very limited set of people who absolutely need to be able to see it. Also some systems allow access control at the column and even row level, so even if it's intermingled with other data you want the LLM to read, you might be able to mask it that way.
Also, people shouldn't be running any LLM on data of a business without a proper contract in place like you have with any vendor who has access to your data. And if there's specific PII requirements, those should be covered too.
A system-agnostic language for magic spells with a compiler capable of producing the magic wand movements, incantation, hand signs or magic circle required to perform the spell
the trouble with compact is that no one really knows how it works and what it does. hence, for me at least, there is just no way I would ever allow my context to get there. you should seriously reconsider ever using compact (I mean this literally) - the quality of CC at that point is order of magnitute significantly worse that you are doing yourself significant disservice
if you actually hit the compact (you should never be there no matter what but for the sake of argument) more often than not you'll see CC going off the rails immediately after compacting is done. it even doesn't know what it did let alone you :)
Matchbook.com is a good example of something with a lot of numbers, the apps are especially good (you might need international dns depending on your region)
I have no idea why they bothered releasing it, but, as we saw with the other models, they will eventually release a 4.5-turbo (or a 4.5o) of sorts that is in line with current pricing
I can't speak for the current version of GameMaker, but the versions from around 2002 ("by Mark Overmars", when I was 9 or 10) were definitely a significant part of my development as a programmer, so I'm happy to see this recommended.
reply