CORPORATE TPP's, CETA's, et al, “SECRET” VULNERABILITIES. Which NON Shareholders WILL QUALIFY FOR EXEMPTIONS?

Please SHARE the info & questions below re; C-CIT, CETA, TPP CORP.'s “secret” vulnerabilities with your associates/ friends, particularly those in other EU countries, but, especially, Spain, Ireland & Greece, who will SHARE it with 10 other people, etc.

I agree with you about the dire effects upon "workers’ rights, consumer protections and environmental standards", but, I ADAMANTLY DISAGREE with your non economic comment that....

"We can rebut all these pro-TTIP arguments but time is running out" regarding the pro treaty politicians who are under their influence of corporate lobbyists with the promises of future considerations, et al, & their statement

"That jobs will be created, wages will rise, and living standards will improve". DUMB comments like these will continue to "just" give away OUR "farm".

From an economics point of view these comments ARE part of the BIG LIE ("Buyer/Voter Beware").There is a truism in economics that the voters do not seem to understand, &/or, just don't care about & that is; unless the wages of the employed & unemployed, who may not be enjoying the same extra benefits as "our" corporate leaders, are pegged to the GROSS incomes (ie, before they write off "the cost of getting out of bed, etc.") of the corporate leaders, the wage earners continues to fall behind.

It is this writer's observation that, not only is this disparity between;

1) the SHAREHOLDERS & their corporate leaders

and

2) the wage earners (ie. the NON shareholders),

increasing, it has recently started to accelerate to the point where wage earners are feeling the collective “whip lash” & the encroachment of poverty, but, the CETAgreement & the other treaties/ "arrangements" are grossly & delinberately exacerbating the aforementioned acceleration of the disparity with the corporate secret enterprises, doing secret international financial transactions (The Wall Street Meltdown was just a small probe before the "invasion") & being adjudicated "guilty 51% - 49%, or, VERY guilty 49% - 51%" against the NON shareholders ONLY (ie. The “Net Amount”) by the cyber (Death-Star Chamber) Tribunals for their cyber jurisdiction & in their cyber "country".

On the other hand, the reader, YOU, might consider doing your due diligence “research” & sending your IMPROVED versions of the following Notifications, Letters & Questions to YOUR relevant leaders, friends, family members, associates,et al. 1) EU Presidents; You've Been Served with "The NOTIFICATION of The PREEXISTING CHALLENGE toThe EU - Canada CETAgreement" (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com "Response to EU Presidents' Acknowledgement of (the aforementioned) 'NOTIFICATION' ",

2) "The MERKEL (Chanc. Germ.) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued",

3) "The Submission" to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA (or, YOUR Submission to YOUR Nations Highest Court):

"The SHAREHOLDERS ( & their corporate leaders) of CANADA, et al, v the harmless NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native Canadians, et al",

4) "PUTIN; The WHITE KNIGHT?"

5) "YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN"; President George Bush reneging on the FTAgreement “with” Canada

6) "But, Will CHINA & INDIA Support 'PUTIN (BRICS); The WHITE KNIGHT' ”?

&

7) et al.

Finally, it IS worth while to repeat;

"What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st". And, if you do not know about the Treaty of Versailles, &/or, its significance in turning Europe, et al, into an economic basket case for the 20th century, ask your parents, &/or, your grandparents

By way of closing, I look forward to reading about your thoughts, your feelings, your improvements, etc. regarding the above.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith - Researcher -“Qui tam..." * To SHARE Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in 1) Native Canadian Treaties and 2) the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, the TPPartnership, et al, via The WAD Accord and the List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS, see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

“But, WILL INDIA & CHINA SUPPORT PUTIN (BRICS); The WHITE KNIGHT”?

TPP, CETA, C-CIT SHAREHOLDERS & NON Shareholders AWAIT SUPREME COURT of CANADA'S, et al FINDINGS, et al to PROCEED.

It will be good for, not only the NON shareholders of the enterprises that will be generated by the on-going global "cooperation" of corporate treaties, agreements, partnerships, et al, including the China - Canada Investment Treaty, The Trans Pacific Partnership, the EU - Canada CETA, but, for the potential shareholders, as well, who are quite interested to know if President Xi Jinping (China) will support Russia as a co-member of B.R.I.C.S. when President Putin uses his potential role as "The White Knight".

And, while President Putin's potential support as “The WHITE KNIGHT” in the development of the CETAgreement, et al, litigation below can dramatically off-set the hundreds of billions of dollars due to the present & future sanctions leveled by American led, et al, corporations & financial institutions via their governments' signing their global corporate economic treaties/”arrangements”, and the potential for making trillions of dollars for the Russian economy over the next 30 - 40 years & beyond, are the citizens (SHAREHOLDERS & NON shareholders) of Germany & JAPAN just being prudent in wanting to wait for the outcome of: 1) the submission to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA & the highest court in Germany, et al, to make their findings regarding “The Submission”: "The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, et al v the harmless Canadian NON shareholders, et al"?

and 2) "The MERKEL Lette; To Sue, or, Be Sued”? (see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com )

Have the federal representatives of the nations that are the potential signatories of CETA, TPP, et al, willingly provided the NON shareholders of China, Canada, Europe, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, with the aforementioned information? Are the federal representatives, et al, depriving the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, of the due diligence information that enables the family of the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, to make informed decisions regarding their financial planning?

And, would a reasonable person conclude by a preponderance of the evidence, &/or, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these documents, et al, demonstrate that the SHAREHOLDERS of AMERICA, CANADA , the EU & Trans Pacific nations, et al, really do not care which NON shareholders pay them the punitive penalties, etc., by way of their secret (“Death-Star Chamber”) TRIBUNALS, as long as its not the SHAREHOLDERS who pay & not their corporations regardless of which country the corporations: 1) operating from, 2) maintain their headquarters, 3) use to do their cyber banking, accounting, "taxation", etc. & 4) et al?

And, re; the CHINA – Canada Investment Treaty, is it understandable why the “coveted” Hong Kong investor & his associates are “concerned” with the aforementioned findings of The SUPREME COURT of CANADA, et al, & the effects of the findings, et al, on the EU, AMERICA, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, treaties with CHINA, et al?

In regard to arms sales; how about the sale of arms (non nuclear) in general in regard to the "trade" treaties that are continuing to be secretly negotiated and how will the Tribunals, both; B.R.I.C.S. & non BRICS, adjudicate, decide & penalize the NON SHAREHOLDERS for the sale of legitimate, semi- legitimate & "illegal" sales of arms within the signatories nations & the those of others, &/or, unaligned? Of particular, interest is China, which does have an treaty with Canada, which puts China "at odds" with other arms manufacturing & nuclear powers that it (China) does not have any "arrangements" with. Are these types of questions that your politicians & the corporate lobbyists calls "forget-me-nots" ("Buyer Beware") that will be (maybe) worked out after the fast tracked signatures are obtained?

On the other hand, it may be worth repeating yet again, "What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st".

David E.H. Smith - Researcher - “Qui tam..." For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, and The WAD Accord & List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS. see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

Do YOU understand how the following INFO can be used to IDENTIFY your INFO. DEPRIVERS & to FLACIDATE "your" members of the GLOBAL CORPORATE ECONOMY? * SECRET TPPartnership, CETA & C-CIT TRIBUNALS due INSIDER TRADING; corp. Canada fears China may Blow "Arrangements" between Can. Lobbyists' Clients & Parties' Executives (W.A.D. Accord*)? NON Shareholders HAVE TO PAY the arranged PENALTIES. Repatriating off-shore; profits, goods & services contracts, financing, etc. and co-manufacturing still not on the table? LINE UP to "PREFERRED" IPOs SHOrtens.

What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st.

(CAN) - Prime Minister Stephen Harper's attempts to maintain the secrecy provisions in the Trans Pacific Partnership, the Canada - China Investment Treaty (C-CIT; FIPPA) & the Canada - European Union CETA may be unravelling by way of the threatened Canadian Senate, et al.

There are several reasons for the secrecy ("omerta") of the dispute resolution tribunals. They are:

1) To Protect the parties to the treaty, &/or, agreement, ie. corporate sponsors, from having to reveal to the non shareholding tax payers the existing arrangements that it has with its own government. For instance, the Canadian W.A.D. Accord suggests that corporate Canada's lobbyists pay considerations to the executives of the political parties for two main reasons:

A) to promote corporate Canada's agenda with governing party(ies) by:

i) reducing its taxes & thus, the "net increase" in taxes for non shareholders & ii) increase its funding for "economic development" which covers the cost of, among other things, the present & future advocacy, ie. lobbying & the cost of the considerations that corporate Canada pays out, etc. It may be regrettable that given the source of the accessed "economic development" funds, ie. those 95% - 99% of Canadians who are non shareholding tax payers there is a great deal of room for discretionary spending & its abuse and B) to protect corporate Canada's agenda by paying the other (non governing) political parties considerations...

...For the FULL ARTICLE, see; Google: "TPP...INSIDER TRADING; David E.H. Smith", & Facebook; "David Smith, Sidney, BC" to the access List of RECENT ARTICLES & CORRESPONDENCES by DEHS.