I am pretty dumb dude so take this with a grain of salt .
Majority AI today can create/simulate a "Moment" but not the whole "Process". For example,You can create a "short hollywood movie clip" but not the whole "Hollywood movie". I am pretty sure my reasoning is incorrect so I am commenting here to get valid feedback.
In my humble opinion,It would be 0 as there is no transaction taking place. The original question is about stock buyers not stock holders which is often related but not always.
I have a feeling that any cost to other nations might not be a concern to TFA in any way, given that the stated goal seems to be to somehow "save the American empire".
Geopolitics from a less civilized time making their comeback, this time without mincing any words.
Depending on the origin country, there's a non-insignificant amount of people coming to the US, making a lot of money, then going back to their country of origin and building businesses or charities back home. Often with some amount of remitances in the meantime. I think that can be a win-win, but the ratios probably matter.
While this may happen to some degree, it's almost certainly overshadowed by the fact that this also quickly creates a vast wealth gap, leading to problems with housing, gentrification, etc. In other words, the people actually living there will very quickly be priced out of many markets. We see this effect to some extent in nearly every country in the world, just mixed in with all other economic activity, so it isn't as plainly obvious.
would this elite talent be that productive there like it is here? I don't think so. I think moving talent to the most productive environment is the win for the civilization as a whole.
This is probably a key thing which gets buried in the details. Potential value and actual realized value of a resource can be really different depending on the opportunities. Individuals rarely exists in isolation, every time they do better, they impact others in positive way, sort of uplifting everyone around them by some margin.
A simple manifestation of this is how we start up coal fire. The idea is similar, bring the hot blocks together so they produce a lot more heat which in turn heats up the entire coal load. Move away the red hot blocks to isolation and the fire would die away in no time.
Only if there's something flowing back that amounts to more than crumbs falling off the edge of the table, i.e. ownership of what these talented people help build, not just salaries/remittances.
Silicon Valley is actually pretty good at that, compared to e.g. academia in the US.
Do you know how Tinder's matching system works? Well, we built something similar. You can easily match with a designer or client, which means you can only chat with matched users. Say goodbye to receiving 100 random proposals or, as a designer, constantly being ignored by clients.
We also rank designers from 1 to 6, allowing clients to filter and find the right fit based on their needs.
Clients and designers can collaborate seamlessly within the platform, just like Asana.
Plus, we’ve added AI-generated fake briefs to help designers improve their skills.
I’ve been a graphic designer for 10 years, working remotely, and I built this platform based on my own experience.
Precious metals like gold are also a terrible investment, but do offer liquidity when currencies fail. For a single person, no more than 1.7% of your portfolio should contain such leaky holdings.
In terms of investment, wait till the market crashes and buy freehold residential real-estate in larger growth cities with cash. This is the safest investment for amateurs. =3
Typically, it tracks around inflation... but some people have cultural traditions around bullionism.
Keep in mind I heavily invested in ubiquiti at $12/share after their early legal trouble, so am probably not the type of investor you'd want to study. lol =)
Yes, this is an example of different asset classes performing differently over different periods. The S&P 500 performed extremely well in the 1990s, and while the S&P 500 has performed very well since, it has not kept up the same level of returns as were seen in the 1990s, nor did it usually perform as well before the 1990s. I similarly didn't say that gold and silver always outperformed the S&P 500, nor that the performance of gold and silver vs the S&P 500 over the last 25 years is predictive of future periods. All that I referenced was that over the mentioned stretch of the last 25 years, gold and silver have been a sound investment. The story is obviously a little different since the start of post-GFC quantitative easing.
I wonder if there could be an option to share the generated ai subtitiles so there is no duplicate effort. For example Movie_torrent.vlc subs can be shared on some other users machine with the same Movie_torrent.vlc file.
Obv you can find majority of subs online for popular files but niche cases usually have low subs available and sharing AI could help the ecosystem.
