It isn't complex. Germany's behavior is pure phobia. Japan has an even higher population density than Germany and is still pursuing nuclear. The simply fact is, nuclear is among the safest energy source possible. With modern safety standards and Germany's lack of plate tectonics, it is basically impossible for a serious nuclear event to occur in Germany.
So you checked all reasons and concluded that's it?
What studies did you consult?
And even if it's 'only' phobia wouldn't it also be a problem of politics and education then?
And while I don't necessarily against nuclear, I do really believe that every investment in nuclear would be much more beneficial towards wind, solar, geo, power lines and energy storage.
Why?
Makes people more independent and therefore the country better equipped for catastrophies. It creates synergies with all other energy storage problems like ev's, laptops and smartphones.
It makes people more energy aware.
The investment will push prices down for everyone including 3th world countries.
Less risk for dirty bomb material.
No long term storage problem.
Less dependencies to other countries because Uran etc doesn't exist everywhere while the other materials are much easier to get globally.
Also castor Transports are super expensive and the whole supply chain too due to terrorism risk and health risk.
I also have worked with plenty of people in my life, the assumption that people are always able to handle dangerous materials which are not visible harmful feels stupid.
Since science has clearly found nuclear to be one of the safest energy sources possible, it is phobia. Literally no German has ever died from one of its own nuclear reactor.
None of those issues are as big as the challenges of climate change. Nuclear waste can be buried or reprocessed, supply chain problems are much smaller than dependency on Russia oil & gas, and Germany is much more at risk from Russia aggression than the very remote chance that anything they do with nuclear could be turned into a weapon against them.
It matters because it's part of our history in regards of awareness to the technology and research and development which we lacked timewise and human resources wise. People in the 60 potentially worked less on these topics in Germany than in France.
The density is relevant in point of risk.
It's easier to find empty spots in France or more very rural ones than in Germany.
Also additional to this, France is more centralized to Paris.
Ah, you can use them like playing cards, like Magic the Gathering or something similar, but the cards can change when placed on a base. This unlocks game mechanics which aren't possible with only cardboard.
The display is slow because I'm doing a full refresh to prevent shadowing.
If you're used to really quickly animated "e-ink" screens like those on the Pebble watches and Playdate, those are actually memory-in-pixel LCDs. While memory-in-pixel is very low power, it still requires some power at all times, whereas these true e-paper screens hold their image without any power at all.
Oh, you can buy as many cards as you want.
Figuring out how to make a good game without too many cards is definitely a constraint. At $15-20 a card, a 60 card deck is pretty pricey.
Not much scar tissue if you see your partner your bff.
Not much of a relationship you have anyway if you withold things.
I'm even sometimes take pictures when I experience alone because I immediately want to share it with her.