Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more FootballMuse's commentslogin

Double lol

https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-amd_ryzen_ai_9_365...

Edit: Looks like OP stealth edited "double" to "50%". Still lol.


I edited 15sec after posting but you got me on speed.

It's interesting I've seen that often on trending posts. There is enough traffic that any variation of a comment will have readers


I guess Thunderbolt 5 will have to wait until M5.


I do wonder if they can continue improving interconnect specs as with Thunderbolt 4 the cable seems to be already the limiting factor. It’s thick, expensive and only available in very short lengths.


100% it is an looming adoption challenge. The same problem exists with finding verified DisplayPort 2.1 80Gbps cables.

Optical interconnects might be the only way forward.


Thunderbolt was supposed to be optical originally, maybe it's time. There are rumors of PCIE 7 being optical too.


TBF, the blender version you reference was from an animation, not the first single still render.

blender (frame 0): https://i.imgur.com/XIV8Hma.png

original: https://i.imgur.com/GGwVibG.jpeg

Also, it includes a caveat:

> Unfortunately, due to the nature of volumetric rendering, I was unable to economically render the final animation at a high resolution with enough samples. So I had to resort to denoising, which sadly degraded the image quality and made it a bit flickery.

> Perhaps, with enough computing power, I'll be able to return to this project in the future and provide a cleaner final render.


And so the remaining 20% of the work will take another 80% of effort.

Classic


No, not really. Increasing the volumetric samples + bounces size is fairly simple. It's just a value in the rendering tab.


It’s called “Gigabit pro” or now “Gigabit x10” and is symmetrical 10gbps.

It’s not on their regular website. You have contact them directly to have someone come out to survey and see if you are eligible for a fiber run.

https://youtu.be/tQV0ltA1tCk


Right, but if I:

1. go to https://www.xfinity.com/10g

2. scroll down to the main section titled 'Xfinity 10G Network'

3. click 'shop now'

I never see anything about a 10 gigabit plan, anywhere. It's classic bait and switch.


The Xfinity 10G Network™ refers to their latest infrastructure upgrades. It is not a product. This is the confusion the article is about. The product "Gigabit x10" is the plan you are looking for, and is not on their website. It's a residential service but everything is handled by the business side of Comcast and Metro-E. You must get in touch with them directly. See these modmail requests on reddit[1] or dslreports[2]. More on the process here[3].

Otherwise you will need to wait for their DOCSIS 4.0 "X-Class" speed tiers that are slowly rolling out[4][5].

Initial deployments are limited to 2Gbps, but they are symmetrical speeds. DOCSIS 3.1 technically supported 10Gbps down already. So we need to wait and see if the infra upgrades enable higher 10Gbps download tiers[6][7].

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Comcast_Xfinity/search?q=x10&restri...

[2]: https://www.dslreports.com/forum/comcastdirect

[3]: https://todayamerican.medium.com/the-definitive-guide-on-how...

[4]: https://i.imgur.com/qt0Enqj.png

[5]: https://www.xfinity.com/learn/internet-service/xclass

[6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS

[7]: https://corporate.comcast.com/press/releases/comcast-multi-g...


Yes, I know. My comment is in criticism of their advertising practices. They're plastering '10G' all over the ad copy on sales channels that aren't for 10gbps service. They know it's misleading, and it was 100% intentional.


Yeah, I unfortunately don't count right now, unless someone else in between us does:

> In order for the location to pre-qualify for Gigabit Pro Service, it must meet the qualifying distance factor. The location cannot be more than 1,760 ft. from the fiber splice case. Second, the cost cannot be more than $8,800 to build; this is determined based on whether the fiber is run underground or aerially. At some locations, the customer can be within the distance but cost is greater than the limit.

> Please see the results for the submitted ticket.

> Name: XXX Address: YYY Ticket #: ZZZ Distance: 1,928 ft, from fiber splice case Cost for fiber install: $14,327.00.


> the cost cannot be more than $8,800 to build

Coincidentally that's just about the total value of the 2 year contract plus fees.

($299.95 + $19.95) * 24 + 500 + 500 = 8677.6

That's an expensive two years of internet service.


Been using https://github.com/diegomura/react-pdf for this purpose for years

Uses React Native like components and styling.

WYSIWYG: https://react-pdf.org/repl


> Note that the Windows 10 IoT Enterprise Long-Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) and Windows 10 IoT Enterprise will continue to receive updates based on their specific lifecycles.

This does not affect LTSC users. Updates continue at least until 2027 for mainstream support.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/rel...


If you are thinking SFF in terms of smaller than itx, then no, not really.

If you think creating a new form factor that others want to standardize means pushing boundries, then no.

Beelink and Minisforum don't sell motherboards. They sell barebone PCS with soldered on CPUs. And certainly not anything in the HEDT space. So they are in a completely different category IMO.

But utilizing the existing standards of itx/mini-atx (or nearly so), ASRock is far and away a leader in this genre. They are packing so many features into these form factors that few, if any, are able or willing to replicate.


> If you think creating a new form factor that others want to standardize means pushing boundries, then no.

I'm not sure your opinion is well founded. Take a cursory look at Amazon,and search for mini PCs. The bulk of all the offers follow one of two form factors, ASRock is nowhere to be found.


Define "save for a rainy day". Are you talking about permanently putting it under your matress, leaving it in your checking account, or investing it? It will eventually be spent, and the only thing that is changing is the velocity. Either way, that is not necessarily correct.

GDP has multiple different calculations:

Y = C + I + G + NX

or

GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Net Exports

Another calculation is

Y = C + S + T

GDP = Consumption + Saving + Net Taxes

Saving either through investment and cash hoarding both count toward GDP. The percentage of GDP that is Saving is the Gross National Savings or National Savings Rate.

tldr; In isolation, scenario 1, Investment is $10 as inventory and Savings is $10. Both add toward GDP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_saving



Nice tip. I've encountered the same thing. Love to see an email generator using this automated in bitwarden/keepass.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: