While I do so love a good use of the word "wanker", this seems overly cynical to me, many systems which are tech islands succeed by growing an ecosystem, the console wars come to mind. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you, certainly open to hearing more about your perspective Can you expand?
Hi there, I'm Gabriel. I was a UX dev who moved to the design side to make a bigger impact on user experience. I'm as comfortable working up prototypes in Figma as I am in Codepen.
To upskill for the upcoming Human-AI design reality, I'm currently enrolled at MIT in a program called "Designing and Building AI Products and Services", and would be open to co-op or part time roles during the class (ends early Feb), although full-time is preferred.
Hi there, I'm a New England based UX Designer and developer. I'm entering an MIT professional development program in designing and building AI products and services, so if there are any AI-centric roles with part-time or co-op opportunities, that can build into fulltime roles, I'd love to connect.
I'm a former UX dev who wanted to make a bigger impact on the product side, before the ball was already set into motion, so I can as easily whip up a prototype of a user flow in Figma, as a component interaction in Codepen.
I could do a pure UX design/research, or a pure UI development role, if a company would see a path forward to a more hybrid role over time. Above all else I enjoy contributing and making an impact.
Hi there, I'm Gabriel, a former UX dev who wanted to make a bigger impact on the product side, before the ball was already set into motion. I'm happier here! Taking on UX design with development chops is a blast, as it lets me control the granularity of the UX I want to describe depending on the situation, not to mention getting to collaborate with a lot of interesting folks.
I can as easily whip up a prototype of a user flow in Figma, as a component interaction in Codepen. I could do a pure UX design/research, or a pure UI development role, if a company would see a path forward to a more hybrid role over time. Above all else I enjoy contributing and making an impact.
Yep! To add, Apple details this in their security whitepaper.
It used to be, years ago, that the limit was a purely software function. For many years this limit has been enforced in firmware/hardware.
The paths between memory, storage, and CPU are now protected by the Secure Enclave hardware which is responsible for enforcing passcode entry attempt limits. These limits can only be configured after a mandatory passcode prompt (or via MDM).
It is certainly possible that certain elements of the U.S. government have developed more advanced exploits beyond what GreyKey could have done, that they aren’t going to publicize.
Speaking of this, the government should build some crazy Rube Goldberg laser that lets a user dial in frequency bands of high fluency output as much as technically possible. Not sure what it could be for, but it would be fun to have (eg asml euv near one end, IR and far IR lasers at the other end).
