Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Grollicus's commentslogin


already decades ago when we were kids eating pudding with a fork was a fun past time, and i am sure the idea is as old as pudding or forks themselves. i mean, the fact that it spread so fast shows that there are many who already practiced it. it's actually surprising it took this long to become a meme.

heck, my cousin bet with me or let me compete eating pudding with chopsticks. (and that was long before i went to china)

practically speaking, the only downside of using a fork (or chopsticks) is scraping the bottom when you are finishing up.


I think the meme is as much about a meetup with strangers to eat pudding as it is about using a fork to do it.


That's intersting to see.

Does the api support progress reporting? ("30 % done")

Of course one could build this manually when you're building the worker implementation but I'd love to have it reflected in the api somewhere. Celery also seems to be missing api for that.

Anyone sees a reason why that's missing? I don't think it complicates the api much and seems such an obvious thing for longer-running background tasks.


To implement progress reporting, it means you are able to know the time a task would take to run upfront, no? Is it even possible to do it accurately ?

Though, I imagine you could have strategies to give an approximation of it, for example like keeping track of the past execution time of a given type of task in order to infer the progress of a currently running task of the same type.


> To implement progress reporting, it means you are able to know the time a task would take to run upfront, no?

No. You just need to know the total number of steps and what step are you currently on.


You're right, but I also don't find a way a task queue library could know that upfront either to implement progress reporting.

Does anyone know a task queue library that implement it ? I would be curious to look at it !


The way it's typically done is that the worker process reports back its progress to the job metadata on the queue, and the web worker polls the job metadata to read the progress. I've implemented this for progress bars many times on Django with django-rq.

I first learned about it from Miguel Grinberg's Flask tutorial: https://blog.miguelgrinberg.com/post/the-flask-mega-tutorial... But the same concept applies to Django.


I had previously asked about this. My understanding is that there is a desire to add functionality to allow this, but in this first release the task system is intentionally very lightweight.


Do you have any source one could follow? mail thread, bug tracker issue, ..?


This is the repo where the development of django-tasks is happening: https://github.com/realOrangeOne/django-tasks


Reminds me of xerox scanner fun, maybe someone scanned it to pdf to publicise?

Nontheless the pdfs have been replaced and the newer ones don't seem contain these errors anymore.


With many eyes, all typos are embarrassing.

The new document is an image.


I've tried the Kolbenrückholfeder of your shops non-ai-predecessors fame: https://etel-tuning.eu/produkt/tuning-kolbenruckholfeder/

Didn't work out that well, sadly. At first it gave me a greek pillars, then when trying english translations it at least gave me some springs.

It knew the https://anycrap.shop/product/airhook. But only for light loads like snacks and the "heavgy duty airhook" it wanted to sell me is for a clothesline. While useful, I'm afraid your product engineers have to spend some more time so that we can reliably suspend cars from the air again.


> I know they are worlds apart, but just look at what happened in Nepal...

They let hotel inhabitants leave before burning it down. The finance minister got caught by the mob and survived. Does make it seem quite controlled, imo.


The finance minister was paraded round the streets of Nepal in his underwear and badly beaten. Do you consider that controlled?


Shouldn't that be obvious on the payslip?


That's part of the problem; it's only legally required to be shown post-ACA.

https://www.irs.gov/affordable-care-act/form-w-2-reporting-o...

> The Affordable Care Act requires employers to report the cost of coverage under an employer-sponsored group health plan. Reporting the cost of health care coverage on the Form W-2 does not mean that the coverage is taxable. The value of the employer’s excludable contribution to health coverage continues to be excludable from an employee's income, and it is not taxable. This reporting is for informational purposes only and will provide employees useful and comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage.

So, it went from "I pay $50/month for healthcare" to "my paycheck says they're taking $2k/month! what the fuck?!" in folks' minds.


Why would they do anything else? Last Trump Presidency caused incredible inflation that for a huge part went into the stock market, because where else can it go?


This is pretty much my investment thesis for the foreseeable future.


revenue is ~80000mil, that comma is a thousands separator


I suspect people underestimate how much third world shitholes are willing to pay to have more influence over the discussion on twitter. Doesn't matter if it's saudi arabia, india or russia.


Couldn't read the techcrunch article but this one was quite nice: https://tylergarrett.com/tech/2023/03/beloved-hacking-vetera...


This is the same article, rehosted under a different author name.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: