A problem I faced recently with web components using shadow dom is styling nested components within custom element:

From <user-avatar> we can give styles to <img>

<user-avatar> <img src="https://example.com/path/to/img.jpg" alt="..." /> </user-avatar>

but not anymore when its below <picture>

<user-avatar> <picture> <img src="https://example.com/path/to/img.jpg" alt="..." /> </picture> </user-avatar>

These packages are really useful for small to medium sized projects where you need little to no customization! When you do need something greater than what the package can provide then I find it better to use something else because these tend to pollute the namespace and things in my experience get really complicated when you start adding your own stuff with them, or modifying them.

Even though they are compact you probably end up having lots of unused CSS code in your website.

Nothing at this scale but this summer in Finland there was a national park bridge fail. The merging of the local municipalities caused the bridge maintenance to be taken care of by the new municipality. In the merge the maintenance was simply forgotten for ten years.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/mondays_papers_tractor_ta...

One could say, to be fair, there wouldn't be any Unix & C without the mathematics of Gottfried Leibniz from Germany. This discussion is ridiculous.

https://www.google.com/doodles/gottfried-wilhelm-leibnizs-37...

No offense but I couldn't find a licence or open source mention ;)

If you are publishing something as "open source" I think you should include the license or mention it some way. As long as you don't, it's not "open source".

Hey thanks for notifying. I just put up the license. You can check it.

I think it is not about doing the actual digging and changing code of open source project. It is more the idea that it is possible and can be done if needed.

Just have to say, it is great to see Microsoft turning again into a software company! Even after all the hate, they do great products and good stable software. A great example of a successful software company.

I find that this is happening most of all when I'm reading in a non native language. And when reading in native, the thought process is much faster and better that I don't get voices(:D) so much.

Got stable release from Ubuntu repositories with apt-get.

Most of the websites work, but are visually broken. Google seems to be working okay.

But the speed is super. It is like Firefox, Chrome and IE are these big slow monsters and Dillo is the little hero running around them.

Dillo shows pages, other process them.

That's their objective : http://www.dillo.org/funding/objectives.html

It does not work for "apps", but to read documents (the initial purpose of the web), it's excellent.

Dillo by default doesn't show pages if they're being served up using SSL:

http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q12

> First of all, beware that this is a prototype in alpha state. It will only provide for very basic web page retrievals, POST and GET. There is no certificate caching and NO AUTHENTICATION performed.

> It's disabled by default.

In my mind that's a pretty big defect.

Something funny, even typing a URL without suggestions felt good. The locality frees my mind. It's ""just"" a HTML renderer. Nothing else.

My stable from Ubuntu repositories for 15.04 just gives me segmentation fault. It's a shame that bug tracker is currently broken. Gonna try with Ubuntu devs.

Dunno how bad burnt olive oil can be for you. But there certainly are many kinds of olive oils, and some of them (especially extra virgin) are very likely to get very bad taste when heated to high temperatures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooking_oil#Types_of_oils_and_...