Its still wrong what you are saying.

A battery stores PRODUCED ENERGY and gives out the SAME PRODUCED ENERGY with loss.

You might not care but the problem is ENERGY which would not be needed to be PRODUCED to save co2 and our planet.

And you can play around with the idea how Bitcoin can be useful on supporting this stuff but honestly? No one needs btc for sustainable energy investment. No one.

And about this excess energy garbage: Either its so much excess energy that the system ooptimizes itself and reduces the co2 output by shutting down or prices are so different than someone is building a REAL Battery to make money out of this. Bitcoin would just put that energy segment onto the global market by some arbitrary decoupled btc value.

bitcoin will not just replace other mechanism/means of paying without a state interfering.

And why?

Because our current finance market is regulated and we don't need bitcoin to free it.

Its not technology which is putting all those restrictions and systems onto the finance market therefore a technology like btc doesn't solve anything.

Companies for example are not allowed to do trade with North Korea by law. So if everyone starts to use btc to do exactly that, guess who will step in and regulate it?

I'm always lost on why people think btc will fix any issues we currently have. There is a reason why people invest in Euros and Dollars ('hard' currencies) and gold.

yes 'pure waste'

Now 1. a bad billboard doesn't make bad btc better. Neither does everything else you mentioned.

2. there is a margin of difference on how much enjoyment and entertainment something like porn makes vs. btc does.

If we would need to cut down on a lot of things to reduce co2, i would argue that btc would be much much further up the list then porn.