Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Noaidi's commentslogin

“I get concerned when I hear, ‘Well, we don’t have layoffs, so we don’t have a recession,’” Sahm told Fortune in an exclusive interview. “But you do have a very low hiring rate. It might not be an aggregate event; it might not be a broad-based contraction like we see in a recession. But it certainly has real implications for workers coming into the labor market.

“Something’s happening here,” Sahm adds. “It’s clearly bad for people looking for work, but we can’t just have this, ‘Oh, if we avoid a recession, all is good.’ It could be that we’re dealing with much more structural shifts, and those aren’t just hard to forecast, they’re hard to assess in the moment because those structural shifts can be very slow.”


But it is not THE correction.

You’re making an assumption here that it was not the increased iron in her body that made them more sensitive to electromagnetic fields. I mean, I’m not saying it’s true or not, but that’s the mistake you’re making in your argument.

I think many people who don’t have EMF sensitivity find EMFs something easy to say is the cause their health issues, but they approach how to figure it out if it is true with zero scientific thought.


> making an assumption here that it was not the increased iron in her body that made them more sensitive

No, I never made that assumption, and didn’t imply anything like that in my post.


Yes, I think it is. And I am one of these people who are sensitive to electromagnetic fields. Both radio frequency and lower frequency magnetic and electric fields.

No, I’m not running around with a tinfoil hat on thinking that it’s going to kill me, but it does cause me, insomnia, nightmares, and a worsening of my mood disorder.

The problem is since voltage gated ion channels are also associated with mood disorders[1] and are, I believe, how EMF’s effect certain people, then it’s easy to play our sensitivity off as just our mood disorder.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3646240/


People can read these articles and go oh cool, but then in the same breath they will say radio frequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on human health.

It's because this article does not show that radio frequency electromagnetic fields have effect on human health.

That’s because you have to read more than what you read on hacker news.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11298025/


So in this case, do we just stop thinking about the children in totality?

In the context of government legislation on personal behavior, yes.

Parents should be the ones setting up rules for their children.


If manipulative algorithm are the problem, then perhaps we should consider regulations that would protect everyone.

Exactly. The problem is no one wants to address that maybe some of these business models just need to go extinct.

Like maybe ad supported infinite feeds can't be done in a socially responsible way and just need to be banned. If that takes down or substantially limits certain web service sizes...so be it.


Can we be it for adults now? Seriously, can we?

I mean, if it affects a children’s what makes we think it doesn’t affect adults? Alcohol affects children, and it affects adults. If social media affects children, it also affects adults.

The big live social media was it was meant to connect people but in truth, it was designed to control people.


Why is it that some people are so hell bent on limiting how people communicate? Ironically, this is also seeking to control people.

If it was a pure communication platform, we wouldn't be in this situation.

Social media as it exists in mainstream life is an advertising platform which happens to have a few methods humans can use to communicate with each other. But that's a bug, not a feature.


>The big live social media was it was meant to connect people but in truth, it was designed to control people.

This is absurd. People have access to far more information today via decentralised media than they did when information was filtered through a small elite cabal of media company CEOs. Restricting access to information is a means of controlling people, and that's exactly what the governments pushing to ban social media want to do.


Search engines restrict information. You get a very limited selection of information off them nowadays.

That people fall for this corporate BS while Tim Cook is giving gold bars to Trump and dining and dancing with him When people are being murdered on the streets by ice is just amazing to me.

Well that’s what Americans voted for. So I don’t think anyone cares that every CEO (definitely not just Tim Cook) is schmoozing with Trump.

> Well that’s what Americans voted for.

Americans are not one person.

> So I don’t think anyone cares

Clearly they do.

> every CEO (definitely not just Tim Cook) is schmoozing with Trump.

Tim Cook was (supposedly) principled. I guess it's hard to pretend that you care about privacy or human rights while eating dinner next to bin Salman.


> Tim Cook was (supposedly) principled. I guess it's hard to pretend that you care about privacy or human rights while eating dinner next to bin Salman.

I guess if you thought he had principles then yeah that could be disappointing. Personally I've never tried to moralize corporations though, I just assume the only principle that every company and CEO operates by is whatever increases the stock price.


And me thinking company values actually meant something in all those trainings. /s

Funny that you think that people have free will under this zombie social media mind controlled Internet world we’re living in.

Besides Trump‘s approval ratings are worse than ever so I don’t think people really got what they wanted, they got who they voted for not what they voted for.


The Twinkie defense is alive and well, I see.

Yeah Americans voted for Trump. But that shouldn't prevent CEOs to show a spine. Tim Cook is no different from all the others, therefore Apple doesn't deserve any less contempt from us.

And this is how they’re able to track all of us, they’re triggering our fear response to give up our civil liberties.

No say "nothing to see here" like giving people nothing to see.

Also interesting that these investors could have invested in power plants to bring down people utilities but they are not interested in investing in people.

When AI crashes these plants need to be stormed and taken over by the people of the community.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: