How does this compare to GPT version in terms of interactive capabilities?

How does this handle images with different compression formats?

Currently we only support TIFF and SVS with JPEG and JPEG2000 compression formats. I plan on supporting more file extensions (e.g. NDPI, MRXS) in the future, each with their own compression formats.

How long did it take them to plan this escape?

From the second sentence, "over a year and a half of preparations". The third paragraph gives a starting agreement date of 7 March 1978, and the successful flight was 16 September 1979.

Good catch! Yeah, it's about ~20 seconds right now with Flash 3.0. Definitely on the slower side.

I'm hoping to move to Flash Lite when it's out, that should help a lot. Also thinking about adding some better loading feedback so it doesn't feel quite so long while you wait.

Same here. The metainterpretation stuff is fascinating but dense.

Makes sense for dev boxes you spin up weekly but don't actually use 24/7. Like staging environments.

Those can just be VMs on a computer you already have. What's the advantage on putting them into a not publicly accessible cloud VM?

By the time GPT 5.5 landed we were already on 5.1, honestly they seem to converge on similar limitations around compositional reasoning.

Fair point! I was hoping maybe there'd be some rumors or speculation floating around, but you're right. Thanks anyway!

context switching between tools is painful. card-based triage sounds smart.