Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more Racing0461's commentslogin

it will move the real estate and tax incentives needle.


Every time this is posted i upvote. Approximately how long does it take to go through?


Also if we can someone merge this level of detail/guidance with the projects on https://codecrafters.io/, i would easily pay for something like that.


I went through it during college times and it took me around 1-2 weeks, if you really want you could do it over two weekends!


thats fine by my. using my data to make the model i use better is more useful to me than using my data to sell me ads.


This was back when steve jobs was suing anyone making rounded corner phones right? The apple watch patent seems like an actual thing.


Design patents are an actual thing and they cover extremely specific features of an object’s physical design.


Maybe? The two violated patent claims are "a protrusion comprising opaque material configured to substantially prevent light piping" and "one or more chamfered edges" of the protrusion, on a patent titled “User-worn device for noninvasively measuring a physiological parameter of a user.” It doesn’t appear anything that HN users would consider technology related was involved, and despite the palpable sense of Schadenfreude here, if it had happened to a company other than Apple, we’d probably be more sympathetic.

The patent’s claims seem likely to be further invalidated once it gets to court, but the timing unfolded to Apple’s disadvantage. (Or maybe not, as they managed to hold everything off until after Christmas sales were completed, and maybe managed to get a bump out of the pending ban.)

I generally feel no sympathy or outrage for Apples patent strife. They are often a target not so much because of their bad acts but because they’re wealthy and a big potential payday, but they’re also wealthy enough to defend their interests and the expenses are just the cost of doing business. (Although they are usually much better at preventing this level of chaos, but they pissed off a billionaire by hiring his top staff, so there’s that.)


Patent titles have no effect on anything. I have several with the exact same titles, and they're all different.


Yes, they’re always vague. Maybe I should have omitted it so as not to confuse. To be clearer, the cited claims are the issue.


> USITC and exclusion orders are rendered void if everything was made domestically You can limit patent holders options by bringing supply chain here

Correct. Companies want to offshore their stuff then want protection from the US gov paid for via us citizens.


> tie it to copyright where if you want to lock the rights up, you have to provide the game in a playable form

this or they lose the copyright.


> address the pilot shortage.

There is no pilot shortage (just like there is no stem shortage). Just a shortage of people willing to work for poverty wages.


This could be drawn out to almost career. There isn’t an X shortage, just a shortage of people willing to work for Y that the market will bear.

Automation really is the only way to increased human productivity. The more machines we have doing things, the less things the humans need to do, simple. The only struggle will be ensuring that all the profit for robot labor doesn’t wind up in just the pockets of a few.


Commercial pilots are actually paid incredibly well. The reason for the shortage seems complex and has to do at least partly with regulations passed that mandate 1500 hours of flight time before one can even apply for a job at an airline.


And also that militaries are training far fewer pilots with the advent/expectation of future wars being primary fought with drones and missiles rather than fighters.


Average entry level pay for pilots in the US is $50K. That’s not only not incredibly well, it’s at best median for most jobs that require formal training and certification.


Also, given the automation already present, it’s a stressful job: “pay attention to these computers for 8 hours just in case something happens.”


ngl pilots are going to be automated soon for commercial people/cargo for domestic origin/destination. Unlike a truck that has to drive on roads, planes have a large room to make errors. In the future there won't be any pilots or even flight attendants and there would be a designated person on there to land the plane if needed at a much lower salary.


> Future

Present.


This was literally the reason I became a landlord. All the houses on my street were being rented. Why work when I can get a management company that will give me 2.5x my mortgage each month so I can rent in a big city.


> Why work when I can get a management company that will give me 2.5x my mortgage each month

I don't believe this. What city and neighborhood?

It is very difficult to find a rental property you can buy and be slightly profitable, let alone 2.5x.

Where?


Well you know what they say, better to be capital than the opposite.


How do you feel about that choice, ethically?


Why would it feel any different than renting out any other piece of property, ethically? If I rent my car to somebody, is that unethical?


I'm talking about the "not working while living off the income of other people" aspect. Because when poor people do that they're called freeloaders and welfare queens.


So any passive income is unethical? Receiving interest from your bank deposits is something to be ashamed of?


Indeed, by this logic no one should be able to retire, as the primary means of doing so, using accumulated investments, exists due to others' continued work. Even social security payments are simply the current tax base funding retirees' spending.


It all depends on what you think about capitalism, which is the social theory that the key determinant of what happens to resources is who owns them

If you are OK with that then living off rent is a natural conclusion

Me, I am not "anti capitalist" (a silly identity many of my comrades have adopted) but I believe capitalism should be an economic theory that society restricts to where it is useful and away from where it is harmful


> If I rent my car to somebody, is that unethical?

Possibly

If you find a car dependant market where you can rent clapped out bangers at high prices

I do not know what sort of land lord you are, but there are plenty that do exactly that


Yeah it's crazy out here. It looks like the low interest rates of 2020 seems to be the cause of the low availability and since those are fixed rates, it incentives people to not sell lowering houses on the market even more.


So build more housing.


Builders won't build at 7% interest rates ironically.


Real estate lobby hasnt/wont let that happen


Merry chrystler (source: i miss vine)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: