Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Symbiote's commentslogin

GitHub changed the default branch name from master to main.

"Wif" meant woman at the same time that "wer" meant man and "man" meant person.

Man changed to mean only a male person, and we lost wer except in the word "werewolf".


In that case I think you just take hundreds of photos by hand, probably with software which varies the focus as you take them so everything has a chance to be in focus.

The device is a way to automake taking those ~300 photos (number from the marigold example).


If you click the links "original model by ..." you can pan/zoom the model on the Sketchfab website.

This is the first example, the butterfly: https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/papilio-cresphontes-giant-sw...


I bought the OpenScan Mini kit for €170 a few years ago, mostly just to play with it. I've tried scanning things like

- flowers

- dead beetles

- model soldiers / Warhammer

- board game components

The examples are all better than I've achieved, and I could probably improve, but it's a fairly slow process, and difficult to know what to do to get better results. The Openscan Classic has a static model and the camera moves around, which would reduce vibrations and probably helps. Maybe using a professional camera would help too.

If the target isn't naturally 'rough' like a flower or stone, you need to add dots so the photogrammetry has something to align upon. I bought a professional scanning spray, which makes white dots which sublime after a while, but unfortunately it sublimes far too quickly — before the scan is completed. It's probably intended for use in an unheated workshop (e.g. scan a car for designing one of those wrap-around plastic banners).

I got the best results airbrushing white/black paint onto the Warhammer figure, but that's only acceptable if it's not yet been painted.

The kit itself is a bit janky, though mine is 3 years old now. I think the photogrammetry service is the most important part, and you should note it's not open source. When you purchase the kit you get a decent amount of credit to use the service, and can buy more credit as required. I quickly gave up trying to set up open source photogrammetry software, as so far I haven't needed to top-up the credit anyway.


We have most of that in <pick some European city/country>, and the statistics show it makes a big difference compared to the USA, but drivers still exceed the speed limit, run through red lights etc and cause injuries and death to pedestrians and cyclists.

Removing automatic enforcement of speed limits would not improve the situation.


The previous election in the US was won by the American version of AfD.

We can see from this discussion that a small number of Americans moved to European services.


I made a gallery of split keyboards a while ago: https://aposymbiont.github.io/split-keyboards/

It is missing some newer designs, but it at least shows that not all split keyboards are tiny things with half the keys removed.

I've been using an ErgoDash for 6 years. I have one at home and another at work. If there had been a similar keyboard with real F-keys in 2019 I would have chosen that instead, but it's only a very minor annoyance.

If I was looking now I think I'd buy the Kinesis Advantage360 (I could keep using the layout I am now used to) or Kinesis Advantage2 (dished, but has fewer keys than I'm used to).

(If anyone keeps up-to-date with split keyboards etc and wants to take over the gallery site, just let me know. I'm happy with the keyboard I have, so I don't spend time researching more.)


I switched when I was 18, and have no regrets at all. It's so much more comfortable!

Following the links to the source: https://counterhate.com/research/grok-floods-x-with-sexualiz...

We have that 101 images were "Sexualized Images (Likely Children)" after a manual review of 20,000 images.


So the number is 0, because you can't even know if those are children given they don't even exist..

Two of the three examples listed in the article appear to involve real children:

> A selfie uploaded by a schoolgirl was undressed by Grok, turning a “before school selfie” into an image of her in a bikini. As of January 15th this post was still live on X. ... Four images depicting child actors.


So they don't actually have any CSAM.

Calling nearly naked, non consensual imagery of real children “not CSAM” is a dangerous avenue to follow. For a child, this can easily lead to bullying, substantiate rumors that are otherwise false, or normalize their unwilling participation in sexual activity.

I think you may be coming to this view from the approach that this is just the AI using imagination/hallucination so it’s “art”, but a better approach would be to treat it like a real photo taken secretly because absent overt labeling of its AI origins that is exactly how the world will treat it.


It's a child in a bikini.

All this pursuit of grey area stuff distracts from pursuit of the real problem.


I disagree. If we solve this problem, we’ll also solve the more serious “real” problem.

The only distraction comes from people saying this is okay, and those people are bound to always practice a motte and bailey argument style to hide the fact that they are generally okay with CSAM.

The same people who defended “creep shots” and “family nudism photos” are now defending GrokAi.

Choosing not to counter them, merely allows them to normalize grey areas so they can use them to freely seek association with others with more obscene and obviously illegal content.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: