Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more _bohm's commentslogin

The reasons stated in the article have nothing to do with border enforcement, and observed supply shock started before 2024. The most recent year of data mentioned in the article ended in April 2025. But by all means, if you have information these researchers don’t, feel free to share it here.


Two people got black bagged by the federal government less than a year ago for expressing this opinion


And the FBI has a wrongthink list for this opinion filed under anti semitism / domestic terrorism now.


> the language that inspired conception of both of these

I haven’t heard this before. Do you have a source on this?


I do not, but John's old videos on the idea of making a language and addressing the modern problems of archaic languages has been cited many times.

Here is a list with his videos where he goes from conception to something tangible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH9VCN6UkyQ&list=PLmV5I2fxai...

The first video is from September 17, 2014.

Zig's first commit was Aug 5, 2015.

Odin has first commit in Jul 7, 2016.


tbf there was a general systems language renaissance circa 2015, following Mozilla sponsoring Rust in 2009 and its impending 1.0 in 2015. Jai, Zig, and Odin were all contemporaries in that wave.


The language is in closed beta, there isn't exhaustive details available. You can see interviews and some details on YT if you look up Jon(athan) Blow with suitable topics.


I meant that I had not heard that both Zig and Odin were inspired by Jai


Oh at least ginger bill does, I remember bill talking about odin's context feature which was loosely inspired by jai.


The actual writes don’t need to be persisted on transaction commit, only the WAL. In most DBs the actual writes won’t be persisted until the written page is evicted from the page cache. In this sense, writing WAL generally does provide better perf than synchronously doing a random page write


Not that I believe people should be jailed for speech, but merely referring to what he said as “anti-immigration” is very much burying the lede


For people too lazy to click, the second post was:

> I think it’s time for the British to gang together, hit the streets and start the slaughter.

> Violence and murder is the only way now. Start off burning every migrant hotel then head off to MPs’ houses and Parliament, we need to take over by FORCE.

I'm not sure what the punishment for such a clear but ineffective incitement to violence should be, but it shouldn't be nothing.


"then head off to MPs’ houses and Parliament" - that's the bit that probably set it in motion


The US has a three part test[1] for what constitutes incitement:

- intent

- imminence

- likelihood

If the UK had speech protections like the US (which I wish they would) then it would fail the imminence and probably the likelihood tests (you rightly note that it is ineffective).

[1] https://uslawexplained.com/incitement


These tweets had 33 views. At least before being made a charge.

I think that puts the likelihood-factor at zero.


Sounds fine.


This is an convictable crime in the US. Inciting violence is emphatically not protected speech.


This is definitely not a crime in the US per the US Supreme Court. Several additional conditions not in evidence are required for speech of this type to fall outside of First Amendment protections.


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/373

> Several additional conditions not in evidence are required for speech of this type to fall outside of First Amendment protections.

Perhaps your point would be clearer if you indicated what specific conditions you believe are missing. Maybe the tweeter had no followers? Idk, I can only vaguely guess at what you're referring to.


The Something Awful Forums got investigated by the FBI after one or two people posted threats about the current president.

So, uh, yes. It's definitely something that the federal authorities take a dim view on.


You're mixing up "take a dim view" on and investigation, with charging and conviction.


Inciting violence is certainly an arrestable offence, and likely convictable. What hill are you trying to die on?


The hill where take a dim view on and investigation are distinct from charging and conviction, because they are.

You would also have to contend with the problem where you've decided that it is incitement, as if conviction is a formality, even though:

- investigation

- charging

- court process

all come before conviction, which is convenient but not particularly bright or persuasive when they're mentioned in the comment you replied to.


It didn't happen in the US though, so that's neither here nor there. America's political system is not some benchmark that the rest of the world needs to judge themselves against.


Sorry, but no. Just because the graphics have some cartoony stylization does not mean that a lot of thought and effort did not go into them, not to mention lots of work from artists. You absolutely could not recreate something that looks like that with python in a few weeks. Not that the language/engine was strictly necessary to do so either, but you’re way off-base in terms of the level of work and effort required for these things.


I'm surprised he made no mention of the SDL3 GPU API since his proposed API has pretty significant overlap with it.


Not to mention the number of ordinary people who still parrot the utter dogshit arguments to this day despite being actively harmed by them


In New York, we are trying to implement universal childcare.


Same in Barcelona.


Works for lots of other fonts too :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: