One could say its a car given the price, you could buy a decent used car for that price but it won't be as cheap to operate or environment friendly.

It is as that replaces 1 car, imagine if every family did that instead of 4 people buying 4 separate cars like crazy people.

It is and a lot of people do it, just more convenient and the norm in many cities to use a big van for small humans.

That ebike can barely protect itself let alone be autonomous and run for more than a few miles at slow speeds. Not realistic any way but purely efficiency based way which you pointed out, still unrealistic for 99% of US population unfortunately. Maybe in Europe where places are more walkable.

Did you follow any of her misdoings? It was highly probable that people would have gotten incorrect medical test results due to her fraud product. Such people get a taste of things like the WeWork guy and keep scamming the system with their fake ass charisma.

So fine her all the way into insolvency and assign community service. How does her imprisonment help her victims?

Imprisonment was never intended to help victims. It serves as a deterrent to other would-be fraudsters.

Fines into insolvency plus community service can do just as much to deter and would be more beneficial to everyone else. Imprisoning people is expensive.

Nope never was true, never will be.

none of those are comparable quality in terms of streaming.

So you were already planning to cancel, no need for clickbait comments.

How did you get that impression? This is simply not true. If this change had not occurred I would not have cancelled my account.

I have the feeling that you want me to confirm your preconceptions, but you're trying to apply logical leaps that just don't make sense.

Let us see you rewrite it given the community culture and guidelines. Can't write i left because of toxic pieces of shit people with zero empathy.

Here’s chatgpt:

—-

My decision to leave was driven by witnessing the negative impact on JeanHeyd resulting from the actions taken by Rust. The situation raised concerns about the treatment and the breach of trust that occurred. It made me reflect on the role I played in the development of the system and whether I want to continue to be associated with it.

—-

No weeping, no histrionic claims of betrayal.

That’s actually very good

"I decided to depart after recognizing the profound sense of disillusionment and dissatisfaction JeanHeyd experienced due to perceived unfair treatment and deception. The depth of this unfairness, reaching a level that I perceived as unjust, deeply resonated with me. This situation highlighted a need for better communication and understanding within the community, prompting my decision to step back. I express my deepest regret over these circumstances, and I sincerely hope for improvements in our conduct and interactions going forward."

-- another version by ChatGPT

If you're leaving the community anyway, does it matter if you violate the CoC through being honest about your opinions?

Not sure how much the empathy levels of someone -- not an objective metric -- should be used when making professional calls about speakers in a foundation but you do you.

The underlying problem seems to be: sidestepping democratic processes. IMO that is what should be addressed first and foremost.

I think being apathetic about it won't solve anything either. An expert leaving a is a big issue as that brings about the underlying rot in the committees way of handling bad or fool hardy behavior from a mob. You maybe should care a little given the flaws it exposes in their processes or lack of managing the human element.

> I think being apathetic about it won't solve anything either.

How so? Me, a random Rust dev, can't ever make any difference in how is the foundation governed.

But, if you are telling us that the Rust leadership will e.g. actively follow this very HN thread and base their policy on it then yeah, then I'd agree with you.