No it wasn't; absolutely no one ever thought the issue with films with sound is that their creators fundamentally misunderstood Girl with a Pearl Earring. Some people thought that [new medium] wasn't art, they didn't think it was driven by and for people who didn't understand any art.
I do enjoy the irony though of you copy-and-pasting a generic pro-AI rebuttal to a comment you didn't understand.
The Roche Limit specifically applies to loose, gravitationally-bound bodies.
Chemically bonded objects e.g. solid rock or a huge diamond could approach closer to the planet without breaking up due to tidal forces, depending on the bulk material strength and melting point.
What is this trend of the headline, sub-headline and first sentence being totally identical? It feels like I've been violated somehow, like a mild brainwashing. One less reason to click on the article link.
That could also help tech giants build even larger/more capable models cheaply. Ideally there would be a hard ceiling of LLM capability that even massive amounts of hardware couldn't exceed, allowing inexpensive hardware to catch up.
I personally hope that LLMs have no such limits. The good these tools can do is immeasurable.
I can already run Llama 2 @70b on my laptop, and that’ll look like a quaint old AI artifact in 5-7 years. I think the consumer market will keep pace yet stay well below SotA, just as it always has. That still leaves plenty of room for incredible open-source stuff!
It would be interesting to see this concept extended into time-lapse video. The day/night segments of the video could shift to the right with the passage of time.
