Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anoncake's comments login

For security patches?


All strains affect younger people more than older ones. Because they aren't vaccinated.


I'd like to think that was accounted for in the analysis. We can compare children infected last year when other strains were dominant, with children infected this year in UK (likely to get the Delta variant).


I'd also like to think that no one publishes garbage studies, but there we are.


There is no doubling here – only random noise.


Anything else is one wolf deciding to eat two lambs. Also, if you enslave almost half the population you definitely don't have a democracy anymore -- unless your slaves are allowed and able to vote and participate in public discourse like anyone else, which likely would not quite be slavery anymore.


> You will find that in professional work for a salary, they are not paying you for hours but for many aspects of the relationship they have with you.

Of course they are paying for hours. An employer has no right to control your life outside the hours it pays for.


I suspect that you might not have worked in one of these positions. I assure you that it'll be in your contract.


I assure you it isn't.


No. Your employer is simply irrelevant outside work hours. It's as if you had quit.


Did you have a salaried job in programming where that was in your contract?


This isn't about contracts, it's about rights.


Mint doesn't have them either.


Tesla is being treated like any other company here – more leniently, if anything.


Has the world ever not been "increasingly uncertain"?


Some people seem to look back on the period of time between the fall of the Berlin Wall and 9/11 as a relatively stable period in "the West".


Quoting from https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2231434-eu-draft-exempts-... (thanks jey)

> The commission is worried that taxing fuel for cargo-only flights would adversely affect EU carriers.

Adversely affecting the aviation industry is kind of the whole point you gits.


Their point was a bit more subtle, it meant that EU carriers would effectively be penalized relative to non-EU carriers operating in the EU, because other agreements precluded applying the tax to those (non-EU) carriers.

Means they need another tool.

The exception for private jets seems hard to defend though, whether business or pleasure.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: