Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | arunbahl's comments login

I’ve been a big fan of Oxide’s approach for a while - thank you for articulating and sharing the thinking behind it.


This. This was one of the reasons we ended up abandoning Flutter (the state of text editing was the other, super_editor notwithstanding).


Aloe | San Francisco, CA + REMOTE, INTERNS | First hires in software engineering, UX design, NLP/ML

Aloe is an AI that helps you think and do. It follows your train of thought, gives you the space to focus, and understands you well enough to handle tasks on your behalf.

We don’t believe the future of AI tools is to automate humans out of the picture – it’s to free us to concentrate on the parts of work and life that fulfill us. But there's no Future of Work without fixing attention – Aloe is backed by peer-reviewed science and original user research. We're combining AI, UX, and cognitive science to help us get back to deep work, creativity, and proactive action.

Find out more at https://aloe.do/company – if you've been thinking about joining a startup as an early hire, feel free to reach out to me directly: arun at aloe dot do.

[Edit: here's why we think this is the most important problem to solve: https://aloe.do/blog/why-aloe ]


This is the first time I’ve encountered the term “single-cell protein”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-cell_protein


Ok, so they're growing some kind of microorganism. But I feel like for years I heard that spirulina would become an important tool for feeding the planet ... but mostly the people that consume it do so in pretty small amounts, and it doesn't seem to be taking over the world.

From a skim, the site doesn't actually say what organism they're growing. Why is it more likely to be impactful than others?


The linked pages read as psuedo-science.

We’ve had recombinant stuff since the late-70s and 80s. For example, yeast are used for the production of human insulin among many other compounds.

Is the scale of production any different?


> SCP represents options of fail-safe mass food-production which can produce food reliably even under harsh climate conditions.

Let's hope we can beat some sense into ourselves before we get there.


It's been hypothesized that glucosamine creates a similar response as calorie restriction. This effect was observed in rats in 2020 [0].

[0]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33478352/


This — suspension of judgement long enough to engage in genuine introspection, followed by a return to the conversation with humility — is something we so rarely see, and each need to engage in more.

Kudos to you for leading by example.


I am so not a good example of anything.

But genuinely do appreciate your reply - makes that little voice in my head feel "less alone"

What was interesting/depressing was my "how about a creed" post was getting a few up-votes, then the moment I replied below saying maybe I was a "crap anti-rascist", my OP started to get down-votes.

Text hadn't changed, but by putting some context around it, it was read differently.


Very consistently I’ve found engaging with replies to your own comment will get the original (even high ranking comment) downvoted.

It could be just a reflexive thing to seeing a given username show up too often. I wouldn’t presume it was any deeper than that.


I think it's more than that.

In my OP I very deliberately stuck to abstracts that I'd hoped "nobody could disagree with".

And nobody seemed to - until I put more words beneath it.

You're right though - engaging with your own posts is perceived as negative. People read the platitude and hit 'like' - the more you put beneath it, the greater the opportunity for something to annoy somebody (and scroll up to try to kill the thread)


“Focus on your high-order bit.”

-Kim Cameron


Everything is temporary.

This is a central tenet in a variety of approaches and philosophies, from religions (it's one of the Marks of Existence in Buddhism) to cognitive behavioral therapy — but few ideas have changed my thinking, resilience, self-control, and happiness as much as this one.


> Everything is temporary.

Therefore, at some point, some thing(s) will be permanent, because otherwise, the axiom "Everything is temporary" would be permanent.

Oh crap. :-D


well said. in the end nothing lasts and yet impermanence is one of those things that always seem to catch us by surprise


Unclear if you read the article and are voicing disagreement with it, but Scott Aaronson is in fact defending armchair epidemiology.


I did read the article. I'm exhausted by both sides.


Misery, like happiness, is orthogonal to material possessions.


...above a certain level of material possessions. You cross the barrier down, and that assertion becomes false real fast.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: