My Dickies work jeans have a pocket like the one described in the article, but at the back of the right leg, not the side. I'm pretty sure this is because if you're wearing a tool belt or safety harness none of the traditional pockets are accessible.
My day job is plumbing. I really very badly want to be able to make a decent living through the skills I've been practicing outside of my job, and this quote is motivating to me. Thank you! :)
I agree, the bread-type mold must be different from the cheese-type. Maybe the loose structure of the bread makes it easy for the mold to spread thin and quick through the air gaps, while in cheese it propagates more slowly.
Idk, but if there's mold on one part of the loaf the whole thing smells funky.
Hard cheeses are acidic (usually around a pH of 5) and salty. There are only a few types of mould that will grow on it. Lots of cheese producers grow wild mould on the rind of the cheese and it is perfectly edible.
For what it's worth, I'm in Texas and the dates printed on the prepackaged food in my fridge have similar language; some say "best before", some say "best by", and some say only "b.b." (which is disturbingly ambiguous). I'm sure I've seen products with "use by" or "expires on" labels here though, but I've never interpreted any of them differently. Just seems like a guideline to me, I guess. Products that have an admonishment to "once opened, use within 7 days", like packaged deli meat, get my more thorough smell test.
But I have two questions for you:
- where I live, most beer has only a "born on" date, and apparently never expires. What about over there?
- and my only test for egg goodness is that good ones sink and bad ones will float. I've heard that eggs in the UK are prepared for sale differently - does this test work for them?
I’ve used it for smaller problems ranging from toys and puzzles to small scale optimization and scheduling problems.
In the latter, my biggest use was to prototype how I’d solve a problem for my sister in her job (scheduling facilities maintenance in a way that didn’t interfere with planned experiments and tests, what maintenance work could be done and when to minimize conflicts with customer schedules). It worked as an example but couldn’t handle the full factors (well, my laptop and lack of experience optimizing models) and they continued relying on (mostly) human judgement (worked out well enough).
I also used it to make a soccer schedule. It worked better than my teammates attempt at making a scheduler from scratch (building both the solver and model). There are already systems for this that the league had available, it was more a “can I do this” challenge.
More important, to me, was learning about a class of solvers and what problems they were effective at solving. Even though I have no immediate need it expanded my knowledge so I know where to start in the future rather than (foolishly) starting from scratch. Or I can point others to it. I’ve seen many devs (myself at times too) reinvent the wheel because we don’t know what options are out there. I took the course to combat that behavior in myself and to better guide colleagues, plus it was fun.
(Apologies, on mobile. I have a few more paragraphs I could write but this is not the easiest entry mechanism for that.)
MiniZinc should've let you farm out your problem to CBC if it could be made into an LP or MIP problem. CBC isn't as good as CPLEX or GUROBI, but is great free software that can run massive scale models.
I just never explored it past the point of trying out the ideas on my laptop. I knew it could be done (and should've mentioned that in my prior post), but had no immediate need to. Their scheduling solutions were effective, though suboptimal (at my sister's job). Additionally, as I spoke with her more I found out there were a lot of factors I didn't know about (and some I couldn't be told about for various reasons). I love my sister, and it was a good learning experience, but I can only work pro bono for so long. She had no support from her leadership to explore this approach further so that was that.
Looks like it. A half-shredded canvas is still the original canvas, while a fully shredded canvas woud be a destroyed canvas. The first one increases in value as is, while the second one would be worthless.
That's a highly unrealistic scenario. If any part of that highly romanticized story of how an anticapitalist artist destroyed his highly valued work in protest had any bearing with reality, by now you'd have the work's lawful owner pursuing civil and criminal charges for having destroyed his property.
Yet, all you see is the mainstream media spreading a story as a light-hearted oddity, as if no one was affected by this.
So, the only credible hypothesis is that in fact no one was affected by this, because everyone was in on the scheme and no one expected to ever be negatively impacted by this stunt.
I couldnt see your work, it says 'unauthorized', maybe you didnt make it public?
Actually i totaly go random with colors but its nice coincidence :) I really like it!
And about graphs of functions; yes! arriu suggested the same below, and this graphic from wikipedia is a good reference point for me, thanks! I have an idea to how to visualize graph of functions from unit circle to make it simple to understand! Will start to work on it in next week i hope.
Thanks for great suggestion, and if you make your work public i really would want to see it!
Your work is absolutely briliant and gave me idea to draw theta angle like you did! Also i'm gonna include an option to draw values of lines in canvas.
The play-in-the-browser bit should absolutely be his selling point, maybe pay-what-you-want. I've always got an eye out for browser shooters where, idk if there's a gaming term for it, you can walk into a corner and then step away from the keyboard and not get killed.
