Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bitdeep's commentslogin

- I’ve seen a lot of debate here comparing Go’s issues (like nil handling or error scoping) to Rust’s strengths.

- As someone who’s worked with C/C++ and Fortran, I think all these languages have their own challenges—Go’s simplicity trades off against Rust’s safety guarantees, for example.

- Could someone share a real-world example where Go’s design caused a production issue that Rust or another language would’ve avoided?

- I’m curious how these trade-offs play out in practice.

Sorry, I don't do Go/Rust coding, still on C/C++/Fotran.


> Go’s design caused a production issue

A simple one, if you create two separate library in Go and try to link with an application, you will have a terrible time.

I've ran into this same issue: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/65050

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuv9A7CJF54&t=440s


> caused a production issue

that's not a production issue, and it's a very niche use case


It's a niche use case to have software that load plugins and it just so happens those plugins are written in Go? No it's not a niche case. If all programing you do in Go is web servers than sure you won't see this.


TL;DR; REKT by a extra - because java just don’t stop on invalid commands, ex: —dry is just ignored.


deserved for this 5%, people get out of mind and abuse the service.


Using it as my default search for my browser and mobile (on mobile is abit hard to setup).

Migrate fully, after Google first search turned into a cesspool of scam AD's and SEO crap.


Tools like aider or cursor composer does not help for complex code as they destroy your mental code model of the solution you working on.

This tools help a bit for initial mocks, but even that, I don't like as they create code that I don't know and I need to review it all to know where things is.

When you are doing complex software, you need to build a good mental code model to know where things is, especialy when you need to start to debug issues, not knowing where things is is a mess and very annoying.

This days, I almost don't use this tools anymore, I just prefer basic line auto-completion.


Not sure if you guys know: Groq already doing this with their ASIC chips. So... the already passed FPGA phase and is on ASICs phase.

The problem is: seems that their costs is 1x or 2x from what they are charging.


Probably more than 2x...

"Semi analysis did some cost estimates, and I did some but you’re likely paying somewhere in the 12 million dollar range for the equipment to serve a single query using llama-70b. Compare that to a couple of gpus, and it’s easy to see why they are struggling to sell hardware, they can’t scale down.

Since they didn’t use hbm, you need to stich enough cards together to get the memory to hold your model. It takes a lot of 256mb cards to get to 64gb, and there isn’t a good way to try the tech out since a single rack really can’t serve an LLM."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966620


Groq is unpredictable and while it might be fast for some requests about it's super slow or fails on others.

Fastest commercial model is Google's Gemini Flash (predictable speed)


The way I see it, is that one day we'll be buying small LLM cartridges.


Yes, seems things start/build on X and get spread on other media this days.


Totally agree.


Possible, but only if you do it in "Founder Mode", i.e., no distraction, code a MVP and that's it. Even if you get distracted with IA our premature optimization, you rekt. In fact, you have 1 week to build the MVP, after that, all your team or you is burned out.


Exactly! Founder Mode means full focus—no distractions, just the MVP in a week. Any detours, like AI or over-optimizing, and burnout hits.


Only 10 credits, so, you can do one shot (one image) to test. Wanted more credits to fine tune.


Thanks for your feedback! We've now increased the free credits to 30, which is enough to try out all our currently supported models. Hope this gives you more room to test. Looking forward to hearing about your experience!


I'm on yt music now:

- I can search yt show and create playlists from it.

- this playlist is available on yt music to me.

- yt music searching and suggestion is crap too.

- best for finding good lives and new artists is YT now.

- as I have YT premium family, it turn to be a good one solution for my musics.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: