I wouldn't be so sure. Prigozhin founded the Internet Research Agency (Russian troll farm) for Putin back in 2013. He's the go-to guy for disinformation.
I use gitolite as well, it's great. Currently working on integrating it into a CI/CD pipeline, which admittedly proves to be a slight challenge, but I'm sure I'll get there eventually.
I'm not trying to infer it. It's another possibility that would explain results besides the stated one that dogmatic thinking and not looking for more information go hand in hand.
Interestingly enough the dogmatic view is that dogmatic thinking is linked with refusing to seek more information. And here I am trying to be charitable to the "dogmatic” by suggesting that we should look for more information...
The hints felt either like a trick or like cheating to me. That's not a stretch that was just my personal feelings. I didn't even consider that the hints were a game theoretic best way to go if you aren't sure until the end where the explanation hand fed you that exact logic.
Just because something is the current status quo in your country doesn't mean you can't have a different opinion. I think the question is perfectly valid no matter where you live.
The irony is, faulting the question because "that's just the way it is here" beautifully illustrates the exact premise of the experiment. I'd say that explains a 3.4 score (at least in this game).
It can just be a matter of separating government and society. If you do that, expecting government to follow the law isn't dogmatic at all.
It's also not necessarily dogmatic to believe that you are more informed about an issue than the average person that disagrees with you. Like sure, it can be dogmatic, but it isn't necessarily dogmatic.
> If one of those arrows ends up killing the fighter, that character will be erased completely from the hard-drive and the player must start from scratch.
Love the choice of words here. This sounds so very retro today; it's reminiscent of the early days of computing on several levels.
Before savegames, before checkpoints, before cloud... there was simply the hard-drive, and you erased stuff from it. Fascinating.
To me, that sounds like a play on the hype train, which can work out very well if you know what you're doing. I think you need to be on your toes for this kind of gamble though, since hypes are usually short-term by definition.
I do agree that this particular hype, if we want to call it that, is one of a kind, at least in my (limited) experience. The current valuation is crazy, but so is the impact of "AI" right now.
My general experience is that Wall Street is actually very dumb when it comes to actual breakthroughs. They just don't see it and they don't react fast enough.
For example, when AMD released Zen2, it was a huge breakthrough in chiplets. AMD was selling 64 cores for half the price of Intel's 32 core server CPUs. AMD's stock didn't rocket until much later. It showed me just slow Wall Street is and how their analysts can't really see past the next quarter or balance sheets. If you have an understanding for how products affect companies, you can often beat Wall Street.
