Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | boltzmann_'s comments login

Very smart!


Sadly, only HN users care about this kind of stuff


I think social media companies underestimate the value of negative feedback.

Also ranking-wise is a very strong signal to have


They will continue to have this signal. Only it'll be hidden from the users.


> constant

Yeah about that..


I still don't understand this. Who is buying art at this ridiculous prices? My only explanation is money laundering but if someone has another explanation please comment


Do you understand art in general? It is valuable because there are people that believe it is valuable. The NFT advancement is that it proves some sort of proof of ownership. Yes, it can be copied, but someone can also take a picture of a famous painting, or buy a cheap print. But they can't claim ownership. Only one person can do that, and people attribute value to that.

Also there are a lot of crypto-millionaires that believe this is the future. So that's why they are going for large sums so soon. I am not one, but I do think they are right.


>The NFT advancement is that it proves some sort of proof of ownership.

It's not even ownership, at least in the classic art collector sense or in the sense of having a meaningful degree of control over the work. Torres retains ownership of the copyrighted work. What he's selling is a transferable limited license that doesn't even include any commercial use rights.

What's a little mind-blowing to me is that the terms of the site don't indicate that the license is an exclusive license. The buyer gets no legal guarantee that Torres won't sell another such license in the future.


Agreed, there are many issues, and I believe that many will be taking advantage of this system. But it will all be sorted in time, and I do think there is a huge future here.


You aren't the only one.

The nyan cat image is out there, copied all over the place. The buyer isn't getting a commercial license or anything like that.

I'm really not sure what the buyer is getting here.


A big dollar sale of an NFT like this makes headlines and is a shot in the arm to the whole concept of NFTs. I wonder if one or perhaps both parties to this sale somehow stand to gain much more than the final sale price if NFTs become seen as a hot commodity.


The idea in general is that you will own some digital asset and then use a smart-contract to license it out in a trustless manner. Reminds me of CryptoKitties where ETH whales were buying cats for huge sums.


> except for social network effects In the social networks app world this is all that matters


Flightradar24 use raspberry pi's? Wow!


Yes! Most of our radio receivers are based on Raspberry Pis. The units we build ourselves have an RPi internally with some custom add-ons, and the DIY units that anybody can put together are often simply RPis with ADS-B USB dongles.


> germany

That's why, just check how tech is pay in USA http://levels.fyi


Don't assume that's most of the US. Most of it is nothing like those numbers and for those with a mortgage and family , saving much of anything can be challenging.


these numbers are crazy


Those numbers are real and it’s why tech hubs are both very expensive and worth moving to.


kudos for the transparency, a really interesting post


click looking for SF, disappointed


Deutsche bank is really really in trouble.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21943167


It was listed in the text and full analysis.


It was interesting to see Zurich classified as more overvalued than San Francisco, but the analysis is not entirely devoid of logic: Zurich has seen fairly active construction, so supply tends to catch up, while San Francisco is a notoriously difficult city to build in.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: