Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | boxed's commentslogin

If you're doing simple CRUD apps, try https://iommi.rocks/ which we built because imo it's way way too slow and produces too much code to use standard Django to make CRUD stuff.

That's why you can do your own migrations in Django for those edge cases.

Handwriting is super easy to fake with plotters.

Minus many million danish crowns every year :P

I mean.. technical debt does in fact disappear all the time: you just delete the code.

If you get too stuck on technical debt you will not appreciate all the deleted code that was excellent use of technical debt to validate an idea. When we are annoyed at technical debt because of bad design we are just talking about the surviving products, and with AI coding we can get more of those. Which is a good thing!


> Why read a blog post, when Google AI Summary can just give you the summary?

Because the summary is often wrong, and the summary might not even be the point?

> Why read a book, when you can just get AI summary of it?

You've been able to read a good summary by a human for most books on Wikipedia for decades now.


A "port" or "a nice Swift API for it"? It seems like the latter in that it requires cargo (the rust build chain) to build.

It uses the Tao and Wry crates the same as Tauri does. So it's a port of Tauri but not of its dependencies

Ah, thanks for the clarification.

> Rather, the only thing that will truly motivate TSMC to take on more risk is competition.

Maybe I missed something, but if Google, Microsoft, Apple, OpenAI, etc want more capex on fabs, they can front that money themselves?


Yes. I think the article missed it. In fact, I expect it to happen this year when Nvidia overtakes Apple as TSMC's biggest customer.

It's going to start a wafer war in my opinion. Best way to secure wafer supply is to pre-pay.


It seems like a pretty extraordinary claim to me.

Considering the percentage of live mitochondria that are exposed to external light in a human this seems like an enormous effect. The effect we'd expect from publication bias though is already pretty big. I'm going to go with the latter until we've got some replication, and a plausible mechanism (like.. why wouldn't whales be badly sick if this was a thing?).


I don't know about the mitochondria bit, but it is plausible that work performance is affected by light spectrum. The n=22 is too small, but replication or larger studies is an obvious next step. Let's hope the researchers in this field use pre registration.

The article mentions that unlike visible light, which is mostly absorbed by the skin, near infrared light penetrates deep into the body and the lowest frequencies of the Solar spectrum pass through the entire body.

This explains why most mitochondria are exposed to infrared light, even those deep in the body.

The article also mentions an inhibiting effect of blue and violet light upon mitochondria. For that it should be valid what you say, that this effect can happen only in the superficial layer of the body, because both skin and blood strongly absorb such light.


Even if that is true, we humans tend to have clothes on, and keep indoors. Considering that the sun is WAY brighter (several orders of magnitude) than fluorescent bulbs are, this still sounds implausible, if you compare it to just going outside for a while.

> Why bombs where hidden

"were". I guess we know this isn't AI slop then?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: