Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | burnerzzzzz's commentslogin

Terrible, terrible website. Loading experience? Come on


Webserver is down


It is hilarious to read the title: "I took all my projects off the cloud [...]" and then you click the link it says: "Webserver is down".


It works just fine?


The judge noted that given the publicity of the case, Henriks true penalty would be living in a country of 6 million people that all know his face and that he is a pedophile.

You don’t have to worry about him doing anything in Politics again. This isn’t the US after all…


No one with evidence of that quality would ever be elected in national politics in the US again. Say what you will about Trump but there is no evidence that he possesses CP.

Moreover, nobody with that quality of evidence against them would be sentenced to only 4 months - laxity for CSAM possessors is a european phenomenon and most pro-pedophilia activist groups are based in Europe. The average sentence for CSAM possession in the US is 70 months.


US also has the highest rate of imprisoned people in the world, I wouldn't follow them on sentencing. If revictivism is lower for short sentences then there is no reason to have long sentences, it isn't about punishing people it is about reducing problems for the rest of society.


i agree with you on that, merely thought the suggestion that the US is somehow more permissive of pedophilia to be absurd.


Last I read he's leaving the country and moving to Portugal.


Being exiled is pretty rough, though the weather is better


What an absolutely absurd statement


care to clarify?


> Henriks true penalty would be living in a country of 6 million people that all know his face and that he is a pedophile.

This is what I object to, not really your comment. Is this factored into the sentencing? If he weren't a public figure would he have a harsher sentence?

> You don’t have to worry about him doing anything in Politics again

Sure, if everyone in Denmark remembers this guy then he won't be popular. But really we don't have to worry about him? 4 months later is he just free to go back to collecting CP, maybe leave Denmark, etc?


goalpost moved.


HN is being affected by the American love of conspiracy once more. In reality:

Danes trust their state - for good reason. But this is obviously taking it too far.

Its not that Peter Hummelgaard is trying to create a spy state. He just doesn’t understand tech.

Simple as that.


>Danes trust their state - for good reason

>>Nordic Waste is owned by the family of Torben Østergaard-Nielsen, reported to be the sixth richest person in Denmark. Last week, the Danish Ministry of the Environment issued an injunction against Nordic waste, and yesterday (22 January 2024) the company was declared bankrupt. The company has declared that this ends Nordic Waste’s liabilities.

https://eos.org/thelandslideblog/nordic-waste-1

Blind trust always gets betrayed, and all the Scandinavian countries have closed their eyes for too long; I want Olof Palme back.

>Its not that Peter Hummelgaard is trying to create a spy state. He just doesn’t understand tech.

Oh nooo that poor little guy, cant even think 5 minutes into the future, he's 42 not 80.


It sounds like they're like the Dutch. The government is trusted because they've been shown to be trustworthy, but they are always accountable. If something dodgy happens, people are quick to point it out and demand action.

So it's not blind trust. I understand why Americans are so mistrusting of their government, it's because they are untrustworthy. The mistake is thinking everywhere in the world is like that.


Denmark often copy policies and implementation from the netherlands. Our societies are quite similar.

Learning about what policies work by looking at other countries is of course a foreign concept to American exceptionalists


It's because both Denmark and the Netherlands have more than 2 political parties.

In the US they basically elect a king who gets all the power for 4 years- including appointing the goddamn Supreme Court!


Nordic Waste and Olof Palme seem like quite random unrelated references. Sweden and Denmark are different countries btw.

The public debate in Denmark clearly shows that it’s difficult for non technical people to understand the limits of tech. Regardless of age.


>Sweden and Denmark are different countries btw.

I was talking about Scandinavian Country's, most of those Country's are called "high trust societies" often with too much trust in their government.

>debate in Denmark clearly shows that it’s difficult for non technical people to understand the limits of tech

Install a system that reads your private messages is absolutely not a technical thing.


Hummelgaard and his colleagues have repeatedly demonstrated that they believe a backdoor can be made that would only be used occasionally only by the right authorities. Even some of the opposition seems to believe this.

When discussing politics in foreign countries, consider how much context you are missing. Those of us that live in the country and speak the language have consumed its news for years.

HN discussions about politics in foreign countries are bizarre


>Hummelgaard and his colleagues have repeatedly demonstrated that they believe a backdoor can be made that would only be used occasionally only by the right authorities.

That's what every politician would say about restricting privacy, it's for the kids, it's in the right hands, we would never betray your trust.

>HN discussions about politics in foreign countries are bizarre

No really bizarre is your believe that 42yo -->justice<-- minister Hummelgaard is just a naive child who knows nothing about "Internet stuff"

In his own words: "We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to communicate on encrypted messaging services"

He absolutely knows what he's talking about.


Olof Palme? The socialist who squeezed tax payers out like lemons, and a bit more?


Jup the guy who was probably killed by his own military because talking with the USSR is against Nato strategy [1] funny how history repeats itself [2]

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Secret-War-Against-Sweden-Submarine/d...

[2] https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Provoked-Washington-Started-Catas...


If you are so sure about that why wouldn’t they make it a domestic law instead of an EU wide law? I’m not American nor Danish and I certainly do not trust my government. Kind of naive - no one should trust their government in this day and age.

It’s also convenient that Denmark is essentially the US’ eyes and ears in Europe, who even spied on other nations for them.


Having a largely non corrupt government that enjoys the trust of the general population yields benefits on all levels of society. Its a big part of the reason these countries are the happiest and healthiest.


calm down, in some cultures (american) sarcasm must be clearly telegraphed. In other, it would ruin the joke (british)


lol, all the americans on this site giving their take our how our politics work or what motivates our politicians is always entertaining…

Guys, our Justice Minister is not trying to spy on citizens. He is not some cartoon villain.. He is just incompetent. He doesn’t understand the technical arguments. He wants to curb the distribution of child abuse material (who wouldn’t) and does not understand that you can’t make backdoors for the police only

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/viden/teknologi/analyse-derfor-hol...


I would have considered a tesla if it wasn’t for the fascist sigma


> This is a foolish take. React is the reason the modern web is as usable as it is

Theres at least one foolish take here Come on think of the 100s of comparable FE frameworks…


All the other frameworks that take different solutions to achieve what react has done well and consistently since 2013?

What are we comparing? What is there to compare?


“syntax sugar” means its a new language. It has a new syntax.


This is the first time I've seen someone argue that adding syntactic sugar means creating a new language.


it really depends on how much syntactic sugar you add.

You could go back 13 years, show somebody some JSX and ask them what language they think it is and nobody would be well that's obviously JavaScript with a bit of sugar on top.


Sure, if I'd been replying to a comment that had anything resembling nuance, that would be applicable.

It did not.


So Python with type definitions (syntax sugar) is a new language?


They should call it Typhon


> It would be best to think of it as syntax sugar for create Element() function calls

Thats what makes it a new language. C is just sugar on top of assembly.

Its so strange that jsx needs a buildstep, but misses ton of obvious ergonomics that one could have added. Why className instead of class? With a buildstep, it would surely be possible to determine if class was a keyword or not based on context


> Thats what makes it a new language. C is just sugar on top of assembly.

I think that's a bad example. C isn't a sugar for assembly: For example what assembly code does a function prototype desugar into? Sugars have 1:1 mappings with host code

Maybe you're just being rhetorical about the spectrum of macros, sugars, and languages, though.

(In my opinion, a better target for that criticism, in JS land, is the Jest test framework, because of all the reordering magic it does that break fundamental ES semantics)

> Why className instead of class?

This hasn't been a constraint since... I want to say React 18, six or seven years ago? I might be misremembering the history but I think that was only a problem in the Early Days when there was paranoia about whether JSX needed to be conservative with reserved keywords


Syntax sugar is language syntax that improves a common pattern from the language (making it sweater). jsx, async/await - things that just abstract common patterns.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: