Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bz_bz_bz's commentslogin

The topography of Houston is that everywhere is a few hundred meters from a flood zone. You are exactly right; the area did not even come closer to flooding during Harvey and is a good 30ft higher than the flood zone OP is referencing.

If they opted for a pat down for 6 years, then faster treatment clearly wasn’t the goal. Metal detector + swabbing is not faster than the scanner either.


Depends heavily on where you fly from. From the original comment it clearly seems that it does make it faster.


Blame Simon Willison ;)

“A common complaint today from AI coding skeptics is that LLMs are fine for toy projects but can’t be used for anything large and serious.

I think within 3 years that will be comprehensively proven incorrect, to the point that it won’t even be controversial anymore.

I picked a web browser here because so much of the work building a browser involves writing code that has to conform to an enormous and daunting selection of both formal tests and informal websites-in-the-wild.

Coding agents are really good at tasks where you can define a concrete goal and then set them to work iterating in that direction.

A web browser is the most ambitious project I can think of that leans into those capabilities.”

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/8/llm-predictions-for-202...

“The browser and this project were co-developed and very symbiotic, only because the browser was a very useful objective for us to measure and iterate the progress of the harness. The goal was to iterate on and research the multi-agent harness—the browser was just the research example or objective.”

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/23/fastrender/


The Cursor FastRender project started in December, so it wasn't influenced by my prediction in January.


> Coding agents are really good at tasks where you can define a concrete goal and then set them to work iterating in that direction.

Wholly based on other people's work. Which is OK.


> Coding agents are really good at tasks where you can define a concrete goal and then set them to work iterating in that direction.

Specifically ones that are in the training data.

> A web browser is the most ambitious project I can think of that leans into those capabilities.”

I assume Linux and gcc are in the training data, so additional options may be OSes and compilers..


Investors? No. Customers? They were paid the cash value of their crypto holdings at the time of bankruptcy. Thanks to a massive bull run in crypto between bankruptcy and payout, customers were able to be paid back in “full” even with the fraud. However, when BTC is sitting at $60k and your missing BTC is being paid back at $17k, you’re not exactly going to be feeling giddy.


And that price at the time of the bankruptcy was artificially deflated by FTX dumping customer assets to try to cover up their fraud.


The EV options sell better in Europe because they completely stopped selling the ICE Macan due to EU cybersecurity regs. In North America (the only market that hasn't seen a decrease in sales), they did a 180 and promised to keep selling the ICE SUVs into 2030 because EV adoption has massively disappointed. The new K1 is now going to be sold with a combustion engine first instead of as a fully-electric.


Doesn't it include PHEV cars? I don't spot EV Porsches too often in one of central European capitals.


Did it work? I'm not sure the financial or car community would agree. They already walked back their BEV strategy:

"Due to market conditions, the new SUV series above the Cayenne, which was previously planned to be fully electric, will initially be offered exclusively as combustion engine and plug-in hybrid at market launch. In addition, current models such as the Panamera and the Cayenne will be available with combustion engines and plug-in hybrids well into the 2030s."

https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/2025/company/porsche-realign...


Given that they walked back many of their BEV goals in mid-to-late 2025, some may find this surprising. The K1 was supposed to be all electric vehicle when it was announced, and they are now going to release it as a gas & PHEV first instead.


Their total household usage was actually ~17.3 MWh depending on what data source you're using for their usage.

Given 6 MWh of exports with only 3.2 MWh of total solar production, they are cycling their powerwall to get paid for the fact that their off-peak rate is half the price of their peak export tariff rate which is inflating the number you're looking at.


That is still an enormous amount of electricity for a single family to consume.


Sorta, kinda, it depends.

In my house I only run LED lighting and an occasional oven, some phones and laptops, a cycling fridge and two weekly wash cycles, in other words, virtually no electricity. I'm at like 2 kWh per day.

The ~45 kWh a day for this family is gigantic compared to mine, like >20 of my homes in one.

But I don't have an electric car, nor electric heating or cooling, nor an electric stove.

If you have say a standard electric car like a Peugeot 208 which uses 15 kWh per 100km, and you both drive one hour (say 60km) to work and back, five days a week, that's already 25 kWh per day.

My heating bill (gas, europe) is an order of magnitude of my electric bill. Even if I'd electrify it (cheaper), it'd likely be an additional 10 kWh per day.

If you have slightly more fancy lifestyle (they run home-servers and a hottub for example), you can easily get to 45 kWh.

I think the fair comparison is to look at a household total energy expenditure (energy & $). My household has a low electrical share, theirs has an almost exclusive electrical share.


I ran my power bill for a small single family home through chatGPT and it was interesting. Cold winters/hot summers, electric stove, air conditioning during summers, and nothing else out of the ordinary that uses power.

- Base electricity: 17 kWh/day (10 in months without AC)

- Heating (currently gas): 33 kWh/day

- Heating (if I switched to heat pump with COP 3): 10 kWh/day

- EV charging at 10k miles/yr: 9 kWh/day

Total if I was fully electrified: 36 kWh/day, or 13 MWh/yr


He mentions that he has a server. It wouldn't surprise me if that consumes the majority of that.


People need to stop using the old Mac Pros for home servers, jeez.


I had a old, cheap, used Dell R710 that I bought used in ~2016 until 2025. It only took a few months of running a new, much more efficient server to pay for its self.


My EliteDesk G4 idles at 11W with 4 drives, so it’s not too bad. I really wish we could get something cooler, but it does the job beautifully. I see 150+ for the Dell, ouch.


It's less than 50kwh a day, high but seems reasonable with 2 electric cars.


I grew up playing tennis competitively and can't remember a single time someone complained about this. I think only academics consider it a "fairness problem."

Do the authors of this paper also want to rewrite the rules of every American sport that has a "best-of" playoff system (e.g. MLB, NBA, NHL, etc.)?


That’s like comparing words with characters.

Vortex is, roughly, how you save data to files and Iceberg is the database-like manager of those files. You’ll soon be able to run Iceberg using Vortex because they are complementary, not competing, technologies.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: