That may be true for some physical objects, but not for things like a secure retirement, protection from crippling health-care bills, and secure (non-bank-owned, non-landlord-owned) housing. There are vast and real inequalities there.
All those inequalities you cite are paradoxically the consequence of the vast increase of wealth and services accessible to everyone.
The retirement insecurity is a consequence to lifetime expectancy having increased vastly beyond retirement age. The health care bills ? You couldn't even get them before, as all the healthcare one could expect was penicillin, aspirine, bandages and hot soup. Housing ? People would live with their parents until and even after they married. Now people can afford to move out and divorce.
Social behaviour and expectations have changed to fill in the opportunities offered by newfound wealth, driven by the search for longer life and higher social status.
Naturally formulated with iHemo and iElectrolytes. Dive underwater for up to an hour and power your implanted devices for 2 full days! iWater contains synthetic oxygenated liposomes along with other patented technology.
Note: I buy into global warming, but that video was terrible and only manages to worsen the case for global warming.
He claims people are global warming deniers and uses ice cores to prove the case, only he's an idiot for not realizing that MOST of the people he's referring to are not denying that the earth is warming up, rather they're clearly saying that it is the impact/outcome where there is a disagreement.
He consistently and unjustifiably uses answers for peripheral problems to debate core arguments which only destroys his credibility. I could only watch for so long... I just had to stop, it was hurting that much.
"Lenny" is a hilarious set of recorded messages designed to waste telemarketers' time."
On a personal note, I have to say that there is something so satisfying about a robot answering these calls. A caller normally has the advantage that you can't see them, have no idea who they are, and they can do it at scale. Lenny turns those very advantages against them.
How do you tell between telemarketers and legit cold calls? Maybe something like "if they say the word offer within the first minute, it's a telemarketer, keep them occupied"? Also, it's a bit dishonest to outright have the robot pretend to be the person, maybe they should say "Hello, I am Lenny, the phone secretary of so-and-so"? And once you pass the equivalent of a verbal CAPTCHA, you are allowed through?
I only have one number, so people from work call me from time to time. Though I largely agree - in that case I just have their numbers in my address book copied from the company register, even though they've never called me.
Ah. "Cold call" as in "not in your contacts list." Cold call usually refers to a sales call to someone who you don't have a prior relationship with (i.e. isn't current customer or hasn't requested information).
> How do you tell between telemarketers and legit cold calls?
If you're calling someone who didn't give you their phone number with the explicit intent of doing business with you, your behavior is ethically disgusting. Stop smearing your crap in other people's ears and get a real job.
I assume you would take the same position in regards to internet advertising which is quite a bit more controversial.
Sure, you could argue that you've agreed to be advertised to by using whatever service, going out in public, or whatever, but you could make the same case for cold calls or since you've agreed that anyone is able to call you.
I think it's interesting how telemarketers, door-to-door salespeople, and certain forms of direct mail are universally hated but creepy, manipulative, tracking, and malware infested internet ads are "supporting creators." There seems to be quite a lot of, "well the scummy way I make money is ethical" whenever the debate come up.
Do you see a meaningful difference between the two? I honestly want to understand.
> I assume you would take the same position in regards to internet advertising which is quite a bit more controversial.
I do take the same position. If I visit a website looking for one type of content, I want to see that type of content, not ads.
> Do you see a meaningful difference between the two? I honestly want to understand.
Ethically, yes, I think there's a difference: I think internet ads are actually worse because in addition to wasting your time and mental energy like other forms of advertising, they contribute to nearly omnipresent surveillance, which is actually more harmful than wasted time and mental energy, IMHO.
As ad blocking and anti-tracking software becomes more common, hopefully these businesses will die out. The prevailing opinion on Hacker News seems to be that the death of the advertising industry would be a bad thing, but that's entirely selfishly motivated: advertising is driving the tech bubble by keeping afloat thousands of startups which provide no value, and a lot of the Hacker News crowd is coasting on that easy money. But if you can't find an ethical way to make money, you don't deserve the money. My advice to these people is to get a real job: I've worked in software for over a decade and have never worked for a business which was supported by advertising.
These recordings are pretty amazing. I've recently experienced an uptick in spam-call volume (despite being very cagey about who/what gets access to my real phone number), and I think this video just tipped the scales on whether or not I'll be setting up my own Asterix box this weekend. Thank you for this!
The Lenny algorithm is quite simple: wait for silence, play the next recording. That's it.
The recordings are always played in the same sequence. There's no speech recognition involved.
The cleverness, of course, is that Lenny's script (and vocal delivery) seems brilliantly designed to keep telemarketers and scammers going on and on and on...
