Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | caub's commentslogin

The question is also the cost for the planet

Many people could climb it, but if too many people take a flight, buy furniture, food, waste all this energy for just this artificial pride, it's really bad.

But that's exactly where the planet is heading

At least when Jornet climbs it with no assistance, no oxygen, it's interesting, because it's more eco-friendly


Seems silly to worry about the handful of people spending a few weeks on an entirely non-industrial task, when you've got a world of 7 billion people organized and running machines doing continual damage to the environment.


it would be great if people not just upvote it, but change their lifestyle, stop to overconsume, over-eat, over-everything, limit their car usage or at least not drive stupidly, stop having useless pets, stop smoking, etc..

I don't want to give lessons, but I have probably 5% of the average impact people do to environment in my country


that's your opinion, if they shut them down it means they are not totally useful, that there are better alternatives, and they provide migration guides I guess


I think it's healthy that non-successful product get shut down


I think non-successful isn't the metric Google is using, else Reader would still be around.


You live in a fucking bubble if you really think thats the case.


network is slow, not browser


I wonder why people need Redux, Using simply React is great and enough if you understand it well


React is just the UI piece of the puzzle. Here's a nice description of when to use Redux:

"[Redux is justified when] you have a piece of data that needs to be used in multiple places in your app, and passing it via props makes your components break the single-responsibility principle (i.e. makes their interface make less sense)" (https://github.com/petehunt/react-howto/issues/12#issuecomme...)

This comment was written for Flux, but it is completely applicable for Redux.

When building something non-trivial, there are other pieces you'll want to pull in with React such as routing, messaging, etc.


Yea I know what Flux, Redux are, and honestly I think they are completely not needed if you understand and use React well, see comment below


No it's not. You can't communicate cross components with just react, you're stuck on a parent-child relationship.


you can by passing right state to the closest common parent. I pass props down, and a custom update function, easy, efficient (with PureComponents)


7 billion human is a lot, but it could still work and not destroy the planet if people wasn't so much overconsuming resources. I think I've 10% or less of the average human environmental impact in my area


Can you plz tell my mom to stop buying me shitty clothes for holidays I didn't ask for.


Most frameworks, yes, not all

It's like overcomsumption when using too many frameworks, it ends up bad


Quantum physicist, nah jk


it's sad the longest of [var, let, const] is the most useful one. They should have made let behave like const


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: