Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chimen's commentslogin

i love frontends like shadcn/ui too much to go away from react - AS MUCH as I'd love to do it since I hate npm cancer to death


What is the "so called safety" that we do?


For example, ask Claude to help you out with a question from jackbox.tv and it will refuse because it's not family friendly.


One of the reasons I stay away from it is that, at least in recent years, every scam that I see taking place involves crypto. I have a lot of acquaintances and I can almost draw a line at this stage: the higher the "shadyness" of the person, the more they are invested or talking about crypto. I am yet, even tho I owned, to have had the need to use crypto in my daily/weekly/monthly/yearly life.

It is very easy to destroy lives with it as we can see in this case, and, making it harder to do so will work against the vary nature of this tech. This is a tough nut to crack but I think the space will remain filled with predators constantly baiting prey into the system with the promise of a big reward.


"You can't undo a transaction" is a core feature of crypto. This is hilarious, because in actual payment networks, it literally only benefits scammers.

Every consumer ever has at one point or another wanted or needed to reverse a transaction. Chargebacks are a FEATURE of credit cards.


You know how in old crime fiction there was often an episode with "bearer's bonds" where up top they define bearers bonds as "this just belongs to whoever holds it, so be very careful" and you just know they're going to get stolen immediately?

That's how I feel about crypto.


Reversibility is great for consumers who are sending money in exchange for products and services. It can be a nightmare for people who receive the money and are providing the products and services.

And it isn't just businesses who carry this risk. If a business was depending on a large inflow to make payroll, and that inflow gets reversed, the people who are expecting payment for their labor also are subject to a payment reversal.

There's definitely a lot of benefits to reversibility, but it has very real costs and tradeoffs.


Unless it's a simulation and stuff exists only when you look at it to save GPU cycles for more important stuff.


"better" is just fashion nowadays. There's nothing astro does that NextJs can't. Worked with both and still work with both.


> There's nothing astro does that NextJs can't.

That's exactly the Turing tarpit argument.


It can do SSG while letting you use any framework you want. You don't need to use React. That's a pretty big difference in a thread where people complain about churn.

Personally, I don't see Astro as a must have because SSR + Interactivity can be done with a lot of tech. PHP, C#, etc. But it has a lot of sane defaults around markdown and static generation that I can recommend it.


Mailgun on the same path, exactly.


Let's hope it is not another "Netlify" honeypot aka "settle in boys, generous free plan, port everything and lock yourself in. I'll start adjusting those prices next year when it will cost you $10 even to send some emails from your contact form".


Huh? Netlify free tier is still free, I use it for multiple projects


They've made some nasty pricing changes in the past. For example they decided on per-user pricing (based on git committers) if you used them for the very common task of deploying branch-based previews on PRs. At my last job this was a sudden increase of thousands of dollars a year for a 15 engineer team. We dropped Netlify instead.


because it has follow links im there. It's a SEO spam.


They are never ethically sourced. Ethically for them means placing a phrase in a 10k word TOS when victims installs app X, game y which loads their sdk. Ethically here means "we warned them in a TOS"


Huh?

> We work with carriers like Spectrum, Comcast & AT&T directly to get IP addresses on their networks so they look like residential connections but host them in datacenters - this way you get 99.99%+ availability, 1G+ throughput, stable IP addresses and have unlimited bandwidth.


mhm, meanwhile his website says he has "Access our 115+ Million proxy network." huh?


I feel like everyone takes statements at 100% truth without ever considering the context or the source.

A single reply with nothing but a quote from the person under investigation is apparently enough to squash all wrongdoing.


I know it's not what they mean, but 115+ million IPv6 addresses easily fit in a /64.


only if you manage to go past npm install


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: