Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chpatrick's commentslogin

2021 called, they want their uninformed metaphor back.

Everyone knows to really think you need to use your fleshy meat brain, everything else is cheating.

I don't know why you're being downvoted, the US has been way more belligerent towards the EU recently than China.

Humans also get into accidents all the time, that's not a great benchmark.


I think the idea is that they could go full speed in sync, then afterwards they could still take you to your doorstep.


The commenter was being sarcastic about trains I think, but while we should be using public transport where possible there is sometimes a need for door-to-door transport so I don't see why we can't explore new ideas that may combine some of the advantages of both for certain use cases


Yeah a few terabytes worth of extra steps.


Yes, very little extra steps, especially compared to what you need to actually simulate/implement a brain which require a while new computing paradigm, one that's not limited to digits and discrete states.


Maybe we don't need to simulate a brain to simulate a human in the text domain.


as evidenced by this comment


Your point being?


They're being trialled in London right now.


I know you know, just practical intuition for 3D graphics in case someone finds it useful:

There's a 1-1 mapping between complex numbers and 2D rotation matrices that only do rotation and scaling. The benefit is that the complex number only has two coefficients, not four like the matrix. Multiplying these complex numbers is the same as multiplying the equivalent matrices. Quaternions are the same idea just in 3 dimensions (so with 3 imaginary units i j k, not just i, one per plane).


> Quaternions are the same idea just in 3 dimensions (so with 3 imaginary units i j k, not just i, one per plane).

I justify quaternions to myself with the intuition from [1]. In essence quaternions represent rotations in 4D, where multiplying by a "unit" (i,j,k), rotates two distinct planes by 90 degrees. The reason introducing a single unit j doesn't work is the same reason this rotation-is-multiplication trick doesn't work in 1D (or really any odd-number of dimensions). Anyways if we call this 4th axis w and pick a simple rule like ij = k then we get some nice properties like

    - multiplying by i rotates xy + zw planes by 90 degrees
    - j rotates xz + yw
    - k rotates xw + yz
    - 1 rotates nothing
Notably this definition covers all 6 unique planes. But if we want to rotate only a single plane, we have to make up a new property, something that lets us rotate say xz by 90 and yw by -90. So we make up another rule that multiplying by a unit on the right does this, which algebraically looks like ij = -ji. This is incidentally why the rotation formulas have 1/2 everywhere, because if we want to rotate xy by 90, we multiply on the left by i/2 then on the right by -i/2.

[1] https://www.reedbeta.com/blog/why-quaternions-double-cover/


It's a massive investment in the areas near its stations.


Yes national money once again mostly being spent in London. Coincidentally where these decisions are made.


The whole section from Reading to Iver is outside London. Also 20% of the UK lives around London so it makes total sense to invest in the area.


They could have used their AI skills to vibe code this for a few quid :)


This has all the hallmarks of AI slop. Upsetting :/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: