Taking away Emacs may just lead you to procrastinate on something different, not work on something productive. So, I'm not sure that this is a tool problem or a personal problem.
Honest question, don’t all newspapers do this? Sure there are subjects where they publish articles representing different opinions, but on core issues (to them) there is only so much wiggle room before they will pull an opinion piece.
No, typically a paper with a strong editorial bent would have at least a token voice from The Other Side and ideally the editorial page wouldn’t always be six pieces about the president or his party every day, but that was before we got this clown show renewed for a second season.
Because the editorial authors are employees of the news organization, they must disclose the conflict of interest between their employer and its owner or parent organization and the matter they are reporting on.
Let's say an editorial piece says "AWS is the best cloud service" but fails to disclose that its owner also owns AWS, that would be a breach of journalistic ethics. Similar case here.
Regardless if it's in the opinions sections, if the author/publisher has clear biases, especially financial ones, they're disclosed somewhere in/next to the piece.
You should respect bias in the news as well, so pick a different criterion. Also the substance of bias doesn't become irrelevant just because you expect bias.
It's hard to generalise for all data scientists everywhere, but that is not my experience.
Data transformation (80% of the job) is very functional and so objects systems don't matter much.
But when you are training neural nets in Python you are probably using a framework of some type. Torch in R looks very object orientation'y .
The issue is not that object orientation is fundamentally needed for data science, but when you install a random object orientated R library you get a random R object system or pseudo-object system that needs to be reasoned about.
It is a pity R didn't just ditch object systems or adopt a limited simple system like Lua's table approach.
I’ll just say that I bought a kinesis advantage a few years ago and did not like it due to the learning curve. But after trying a couple other ergonomic keyboards, and then coming back to the low force, kinesis advantage 2 LF, it’s now the only keyboard I want to use.
Others can make more informed recommendations; to the best of my knowledge it's going to depend on your keyboard and what firmware it runs. (There are some os-level heatmappers you can use, too.) When I used a Voyager I used the Heatmap feature in ZSA's keymapp app. When I was using a corne I used Via/Vial to do it. I finally found my way to the glove and used the data from those.
These satellites are in a rather thin band of space and it's clearly a problem as debris has already hit the space station and satellites. Tracking satellites is clearly a necessity. Could we use some partners? Probably worth look into with the ESA and Japan/India to share cost, burden, and information. Not doing it because of a trite expression doesn't seem like a good idea.