Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more colorincorrect's commentslogin

nitpicking here, but Cogito Ergo Sum (“I think, therefore I am”) has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. in modern vernacular you might translate it as "i percieve/witness therefore i exist"


You might take it that way, but are you sure that's correct. The derivation/etymology of cogito appears to imply active thought, as does penser (I've always assumed Descartes conceived it in French, and translated, but I confess I don't know which natural language - if any - his mind was using). As opposed to merely passively regarding the World. The epigram's context is "application of reason", at least.


I'm pretty sure when Decartes said that, he meant that that's the only thing we know for sure to be true, since everything else could be a hallucination. He wasn't making an argument for cognitive enhancement... was he?


You're right this sounds like a bad essay.


is there a similar analysis of google/facebook/instagram?



fyi amazon does this too.. likely most large consumer sites that face fraud activity do


Yes, they don't give the data they harvest to an authoritarian government that already has proven they will use said data to target and ID people for arrest/detention/torture.

Which is an important distinction.


TikTok has said that their TikTok China and TikTok elsewhere apps keep their app and user data completely separate (in both data centers and policy).

Kind of like how Apple complies with iCloud China and Apple iCloud everywhere else.

Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tiktok-army/army-exam...


How is it possible that there be two separate silos when I can follow someone in China despite being in the US


The person in China can use TikTok (international) or you can use Douyin (Chinese), putting the two of you in the same silo.


Are you seriously implying the Chinese government doesn't have access to both of these sets of data?


I was answering the question about following someone in the other silo (not possible), not implying that the siloing makes data exfiltration absolutely impossible.

Note however that for the Chinese silo, they can just open the front door, whereas doing the same for the international version would endanger their profits. Profit is an incentive the CCP responds to very well. For the surveillance agencies, hacking the database is probably easier than setting up an official channel that too many people would have to know about and agree to.


And if the CCP asked for access to TikTok's international data, do you think they have the ability to say no?


dumb question, but if VCs decided that the venture is profitable under a certain model (aka: no limits pricing), then why doesn't the domain registry just do so themselves?


there are a lot of dashcam footages of car crashes on youtube. i wonder if that information can be salvaged in some way


I'm curious if there's any "good" positive correlations with screen time. Any ideas?


obligatory comment that uBlockMatrix or any similar content blocker is good, but would anyone tell me if that is sufficient as well?


Im more curious as to how they were found: can not even the richest of persons be completely secretive of their money?


Secretive from whom? I'd kind of hope that as people get richer it gets harder to hide vast sums from the tax authorities and the antiterrorism investigators, but that appears not to be the case.


not that i believe (or not) that this will eventually be feasible, but the dream is that if you feed an introductory paragraph (which includes a thesis) to the algo, it will be able to generate the next 4 paragraphs, which completes a 5 paragraph essay.


What I would be more interested in is feeding it a topic, it goes out and summarizes sources, then arranges those summaries to make a point. I'd actually really like this driving around. I could just have ai give me the tldr on topics I'm interested in.


known nothing about the results, i suspect that mid-ranges are poorer mainly because human frequency response is most sensitive towards mid-range aka vocal-pitch frequency


unrelated question: but why would any investigator leak information like this? who benefits?


i suppose there are trade deal talks going on between us and china?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: