Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more csin's comments login

Forgive me for being pedantic. The agent's name in Mission Impossibles is Ethan Hunt.


Forgive me for being even more pedantic, but the person who received the self-destructing messages was Dan Briggs, who was replaced by Jim Phelps on season 2. Ethan Hunt only got the job on the first movie of the series.


Good catch. And yes, I intentionally conflated the two series, which might be unforgivable.


The fastest way to get an answer on the internet is to post a wrong answer.



China hasn't been a "Communist" country since the 80's. When Deng Xiaoping took over after Mao's death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform

The word "Communism" is irrelevant for economists. China is still refer to as that for the sake of historical significance.


It's still widely perceived as "red" both by the general population and in media. The fact that it still has autocratic one-party system is seen as a proof of communism, while the truth is that they actually implement very few socialistic ideas nowadays in terms of workers' rights, social protection, job protection, etc. Take Iceland for instance, it's far closer to the ideas of communism than China now.


Apparently honey bees are gonna be fine. Humans will keep them alive. It's the wild bees that show signs of mass extinction.

https://www.wired.com/2015/04/youre-worrying-wrong-bees/


Thank you, this was an interesting read. TIL.


Like, the ones that pollinate every crop?


Yea. I'm not sure what's gonna happen to wild flowers/vegetation after the wild bees die out though :(


Joey can get technical at times. On top of that, he's more of a Pot Limit Omaha player, than Texas Holdem. So he tends to gloss over the nuances of Texas Holdem.

Doug Polk is more "user friendly" if you want to learn more about high level poker.

It's a 4 hour video. If you got any specific questions, shoot.



For what it's worth, clear cutting the Amazon and replacing it with farms is probably better for humanity when it comes to Maslow needs


I wonder if you'll be singing a different tune, if you were born black...


What tune? I'm just giving a theory of why things have evolved the way they have.


> potential criminals

This is a self-referential definition.

The removal of vibrant individuals from such communities is design to crippled them, making them more reliant on, e.g. unfavorable employment.


Who is a “vibrant individual.”


We could just start by addressing the elephant in the room which is that black people are disproportionately arrested for marijuana despite using drugs at the same rate as white people [1].

Which, naturally, can cripple families for incredibly small amounts of possession.

[1] https://www.splcenter.org/20180918/racial-profiling-louisian...


>despite using drugs at the same rate as white people

This statistic does not accommodate for cultural differences in use. It's quite possible that black people are more likely to carry and/or use marijuana in public or while driving.


I’m literally just asking what the term “vibrant individual” means.


I thought that I sort of implied that in the root post, although I expect that there's more to it than your example.

It's easy these days to get arrested for minor deviltries (way easier than when I was a lad) so the police have that in their pocket.

So, you pick out the groups who are statistically most likely to commit real crimes, pick them up for any old thing, and warehouse them until they are more old and tired.

Like I said, it's not fair, but it appears to work to some extent.


Every living being.

The point is that criminalization of poverty drains vitality from already-marginalized communities.


Wouldn't surprise me if law abiding black people are the biggest beneficiaries of the way the system works. Imagine living in the ghetto if there was no policing.


> Imagine living in the ghetto if there was no policing.

There would be plenty of problems, but not being stopped and frisked constantly because of skin tone even though white people are more likely per capita to actually be a valid target of the frisking[1] would probably be nice.

[1]: https://www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data https://www.nyclu.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/20... ("Black and Latino people were more likely to be frisked than whites and, among those frisked, were less likely to be found with a weapon.")


Not be mention being fined in multiple countries for shady marketing practices!


I've seen guys in a poker room use it as a fancy way of saying their "decision making strategy".


That's an entirely valid use of the term. "Algorithm" comes from "al-Khwarizmi", a Persian mathematician from 700-800s. "Euclid's algorithm" is from 300 BC.

In its original conception, "algorithm" just referred to any series of steps one could follow mechanically to reach a solution to a problem. Delegating those mechanical steps to a computer (another word that used to refer to a person!) came much later.


This isn't necessarily a misuse of the word.


You're not gona like this answer. They need capital because they are making loses year on year. Without the capital, they will be run out of money.


I think trading analogies is more healthier than the Ben-Shapiro-I-win-because-I-sound-smarter-than-you style of debate.

We can trade analogies. And figure out where Facebook should lie, on the spectrum of analogies.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: