> Company policy doesn't apply to their personal computing.

Sure, it'll come over as "oh I'm just running an experiment" after your infra/security teams notice. Seen @ public company before current ai hype.

Nontechnical people I know are buying hardware to run claws on. As I understand it, the innovation here isn't the tech but in availability/ease of access.

I had always thought the primary focus on single-payer was risk pool economics, not administrative efficiency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_pool

> buyers think they’re buying domestic

This is hard to tell from the discussion, but are you defending this practice?

> this also loses you taste

I won't forget the in-person interview round where I coded a frontend visualization for a data graph (tracking global shipping), then fielded a post-work general interview round from the whole company (~10 ppl) about specifics and "choices" made during a rush to finish. I ended up not going due to comp, but they were acquired months later. Life is funny.

Late thought, but you could set up "beacon" locations for each client to pull a local grid derived from coordinates?

Wouldn't solve that 1s latency thing, but might be interesting in other applications.

That free upgrade refuses to work with my hardware. I am glad they are continuing security, but they are literally forcing me to install another OS (as I understand the security difference).

This project improves the AI, but might not be quite what you want?

https://github.com/induktio/thinker

> "feel" systems

I used to play a tcg a bit too seriously, and sometimes seeing incorrect game states would trigger something. Part of tracking game states and derivations I guess. Only sometimes helpful in software.

Even the article points out this analysis includes both condos and single-family homes, despite their wildly different demand situations.