Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | derpenxyne's comments login

Chrome - still speedy, still simple (with lots of advanced features) and still secure. The channel release system, dev tools and syncing all my files/settings between devices is a god send.


Inaccessible in Chrome 53.0.2785.21 dev-m (64-bit)

Unsupported protocol

The client and server don't support a common SSL protocol version or cipher suite.

https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=searx.me


Probably due to the fact that they only have DHE ciphersuites.

from Chrome's dev console:

      www.searx.me/:1 This site requires a DHE-based SSL cipher suite. These are deprecated and will be removed in M52, around July 2016. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5752033759985664 for more details.


A member of the team has just opened a potential solution to the problem through the new chrome.fileSystemProvider API: crbug.com/422764


And, as I already posted, it's a rather idiotic one. Does the project member not understand the issue? Kernel support hasn't been removed yet, just the userspace stuff. Last thing we need is to rewrite existing, solid code in JS.


Chrome extension: http://goo.gl/VsD5s :)


A Chrome extension that solves this issue: http://goo.gl/VsD5s. Extract the files, head to chrome://extensions > Load unpacked extension and select the folder.


This is the latest message: http://i.imgur.com/ogDhMQp.png


back to safety takes me to about:blank Does it take you to https://www.google.com/ ?


For some part I agree with you but it's difficult to make the cut down to 80 characters for titles.


Clean and simple, I like it. I think an about page for new visitors would be good though.


Yeah I was trying to decide whether it needed one or not. So far people seem to be getting it, but I might still add one.


Apologies if that offends you, if I could still edit the title to appease you, I would.


By the converse opinion, if you actually set the privacy settings on Facebook, and Google for that matter, to your comfort level, your data is probably more secure than if you weren't using Facebook or Google etc.


I think by now it is obvious that issue is not about privacy anymore rather how these gigantic companies are "using" your data to their advantage, and not really yours!


How can data that is leaked and or used by Zuckerberg & co possibly be more secure than data that doesn't exist (eg because I don't use fb)


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: